are matters for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are matters for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that certain issues or topics are the responsibility or concern of a specific person or group. Example: "These financial decisions are matters for the board of directors to discuss and approve."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Elsewhere these are matters for the Land.

The Economist

Those are matters for another day.

The New York Times

These are matters for the Treasury.

The Guardian - Business

Those are matters for the police.

The Guardian

But then, maybe, those are matters for another book.

The New York Times - Books

But these are matters for other kinds of exploration.

The New York Times

These are matters for the offeree company and its shareholders.

Harvard University

Those are matters for Congress to determine, not the courts.

Cornell University

"These are matters for the F.B.I.," he added.

The New York Times

However, they are matters for the national government, not rights that can be given by states.

The New York Times

Identification of Scottish taxpayers and administering the tax are matters for the UK government and HMRC.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are matters for", ensure the subject and the responsible party are clearly defined. For example, "Budget allocations are matters for the finance committee."

Common error

Avoid using "are matters for" when the responsibility is vague or shared. Be specific about who holds the authority to prevent confusion or inaction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are matters for" functions as a predicative expression, linking a subject to its area of responsibility, concern, or relevance. As demonstrated by Ludwig AI, this phrase indicates that certain issues, decisions, or topics fall under the purview of a specified entity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

27%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are matters for" is a versatile expression used to indicate responsibility, jurisdiction, or relevance. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, including news, academia, business, and science. When writing, use "are matters for" to clearly define who is responsible for a given task or decision. Related phrases include "are the responsibility of", "fall under the purview of", and "are within the jurisdiction of". Although the phrase is generally neutral, avoid vagueness and always specify the responsible party to ensure clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are the responsibility of

Focuses specifically on who is accountable or in charge.

are the concern of

Indicates something that affects or involves someone.

fall under the purview of

Highlights the scope or extent of authority or control.

are within the jurisdiction of

Emphasizes legal or official authority.

are up to

Indicates that a decision or action is someone's responsibility or choice.

are relevant to

Stresses the importance or connection to a particular subject.

are to be determined by

Focuses on the process of making a decision or conclusion.

are subjects for

Highlights that something is the focus of discussion or study.

are the business of

Suggests that something is the concern or responsibility of someone.

are open for debate

Emphasizes that a topic is not settled and invites discussion.

FAQs

How do I use "are matters for" in a sentence?

Use "are matters for" to indicate that specific decisions, responsibilities, or concerns belong to a particular entity. For instance, "Operational decisions "are matters for" the manager."

What phrases can I use instead of "are matters for"?

You can use phrases like "are the responsibility of", "fall under the purview of", or "are within the jurisdiction of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is matters for" instead of "are matters for"?

No, it is grammatically incorrect. Use "are matters for" when referring to plural subjects or general topics, and "is a matter for" when referring to a singular subject.

What's the difference between "are matters for" and "are subject to"?

"Are matters for" indicates responsibility or jurisdiction, while "are subject to" means something is conditional upon or influenced by something else. For example, "These plans are matters for discussion" versus "These plans are subject to approval".