are identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of recognizing or determining the identity of something or someone. Example: "In the study, several key factors are identified that contribute to the overall success of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Photoionization edges are identified.

Nature

The targets are identified.

The Guardian - Sport

YUL policies are identified.

Yale University

Several features are identified.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Major absorbers are identified.

Harvard University

Strong emission lines are identified.

Nature

Reduction products are identified.

Electrochimica Acta

Two behaviors are identified.

Acta Materialia

Major atmospheric absorbers are identified.

Harvard University

Not all images are identified.

Columbia University

Dimmick and others are identified.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are identified" in passive voice constructions to emphasize the object or concept being identified rather than the identifier. For example, "The key factors "are identified" in the report".

Common error

Avoid using "are identified" in active voice constructions. This phrase is inherently passive; using it actively can lead to awkward or grammatically incorrect sentences. For example, instead of "Researchers "are identified" the genes," use "The genes "are identified" by researchers."

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "are identified" is to form the passive voice of the verb "identify" in the present tense. This construction is used when the subject of the sentence receives the action, rather than performing it. As Ludwig examples show, the phrase highlights the recognized entities rather than the identifier.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

Academia

27%

News & Media

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are identified" functions as the passive voice present tense of the verb 'to identify'. It's grammatically correct and frequently used, especially in scientific, academic, and news contexts. As Ludwig AI pointed out, the phrase works in the process of recognizing and determining the identity of something. While versatile, it's crucial to use it correctly in passive voice constructions, avoiding active voice misuse. Alternatives like "have been recognized" or "have been detected" can provide nuanced variations in meaning. As evidenced by the example sentences, "are identified" usually comes up in papers and academic contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have been recognized

Emphasizes the act of noticing or acknowledging something that already exists.

have been detected

Suggests the discovery of something, often through specific methods or instruments.

have been determined

Implies a careful and conclusive process of finding something out.

have been pinpointed

Conveys a precise location or identification.

have been classified

Indicates a systematic categorization or grouping.

have been distinguished

Highlights the act of differentiating something from others.

have been ascertained

Suggests a process of finding something out for certain.

have been uncovered

Implies the revelation of something previously hidden.

have been diagnosed

Relates specifically to the identification of a condition or problem.

have been named

Focuses on the act of giving a name to something.

FAQs

How can I use "are identified" in a sentence?

"Are identified" is used to describe something that has been recognized or discovered. For example, "The main issues "are identified" in the report."

What are some alternatives to "are identified"?

You can use alternatives such as "have been recognized", "have been detected", or "have been determined" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "are identified"?

"Are identified" is appropriate when you want to emphasize that something has been recognized or found, often as the result of a specific process or investigation. It's commonly used in scientific, academic, and formal contexts.

What's the difference between "are identified" and "were identified"?

"Are identified" is present tense, indicating that something is currently being identified or has been identified recently. "Were identified" is past tense, indicating that something was identified at some point in the past.