are free from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are free from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of something undesirable or unwanted in a particular context. Example: "The products we offer are free from harmful chemicals, ensuring safety for our customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Of these, 13 are free from cancer.

The New York Times

These calculations are free from empirical constants.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Subscriptions are free from [phone] or [email protected].

The New York Times

Few claims about tDCS are free from controversy.

The New Yorker

All its decisions are free from political influence.

The Guardian

The youth, they are free from all that".

The New York Times

While on night float, residents are free from daytime responsibilities.

Yale University

Privacy is the space where we are free from interference.

MIT Technology Review

Statehood can wait until we are free from occupation.

The Guardian

Routes generated are free from cycles and guarantee message delivery.

Parallel Computing

Thus these particles are free from surface charges.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are free from", ensure the context clearly specifies what is absent or avoided to prevent ambiguity. For example, "The software updates are free from known bugs".

Common error

Avoid using "are free from" when a more specific term would be more accurate. For example, instead of saying "The discussion was free from disagreement", consider "The discussion was harmonious".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are free from" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the subject as being in a state of lacking or being without something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

41%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are free from" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to indicate the absence of something, particularly something undesirable. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use. It's commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts, maintaining a generally neutral register. When using "are free from", ensure clarity and avoid overgeneralization, opting for more specific language when appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are devoid of

Indicates a complete absence, often of something essential or desirable; slightly stronger in emphasis than "are free from".

are without

A more general term indicating the absence of something, applicable in a broader range of contexts.

are exempt from

Specifically indicates being excused or not subject to a particular rule or obligation.

are clear of

Suggests the removal or absence of something that was previously present or expected.

are immune to

Implies a resistance or inability to be affected by something, often a disease or harmful influence.

do not include

Indicates that something is not a component or part of a larger whole.

lack

A concise way of saying something is missing or not present.

exclude

To deliberately leave out something, implying a conscious decision.

are not subject to

Indicates not being under the control or influence of something.

are independent of

Implies a lack of influence or control from an external source or factor.

FAQs

How can I use "are free from" in a sentence?

The phrase "are free from" indicates the absence of something. For example, "Our products "are free from" harmful chemicals" means they don't contain harmful chemicals.

What can I say instead of "are free from"?

You can use alternatives like "are devoid of", "are without", or "lack" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "are free from" or "are without"?

Both "are free from" and "are without" are correct, but "are free from" often implies a more deliberate effort to avoid something, while "are without" is a more general statement of absence.

Which is correct, "are free from" or "are exempt from"?

"Are free from" generally means 'not containing' or 'lacking', while "are exempt from" means 'not required to follow a rule'. The correct choice depends on the intended meaning.