are without

USAGE SUMMARY

"are without" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe a situation in which something is missing or absent, for example: "Many schools are without the necessary supplies to ensure the safety of students."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

They are without force.

The New Yorker

The allegations are without merit".

The New York Times

"They are without any foundation".

The New York Times

Now they are without insurance.

The Economist

They are without foundation".

The Guardian

Children are without school.

The Guardian

We are without value.

The New York Times

We are without hope.

The Guardian

They are without peer.

The Guardian - Music

Especially when folks are without a job.

The New York Times

(All prices are without drinks or tip).

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are without" to clearly and directly express the absence of something, ensuring the context makes the missing element evident. For example, instead of saying "the project lacks funding", try "the project is without funding".

Common error

Avoid using "are without" when a more specific term accurately describes the deficiency. For example, instead of saying "the essay is without clarity", revise to "the essay is unclear" for more directness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are without" functions as a stative verb phrase, indicating a state of lacking or absence. It connects a subject with a condition of being without something, as seen in Ludwig's examples such as "They are without force" or "Children are without school".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are without" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates the absence or lack of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly news and media. While versatile, it leans toward a more formal tone, so consider your audience when choosing between "are without" and simpler alternatives like "lack". Understanding its function and usage patterns, as detailed in the linguistic analysis, will help you effectively incorporate this phrase into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lack

Focuses on the absence of something, often implying a deficiency.

do not have

A straightforward expression indicating the absence of possession.

have no

Expresses a lack of something, focusing on the absence of possession or presence.

are devoid of

Emphasizes a complete absence, often with a negative connotation.

do not possess

A more formal way of saying "do not have", emphasizing a lack of ownership.

are missing

Highlights that something is not present or is absent.

are absent of

Indicates a lack or absence, similar to "are without", but using 'absent'.

are deficient in

Highlights a lack or shortage of a particular quality or element.

are wanting in

Suggests a deficiency or inadequacy in something.

do without

Indicates the ability to manage or survive in the absence of something.

FAQs

How can I use "are without" in a sentence?

You can use "are without" to indicate the absence of something. For example, "Many families "are without power" after the storm" or "The allegations "are without merit"".

What phrases are similar to "are without"?

Similar phrases include "lack", "do not have", or "are devoid of", which all indicate the absence or lack of something.

Is it always appropriate to use "are without"?

While grammatically correct, "are without" may sometimes sound formal. Consider the context; simpler alternatives like "lack" may be preferable in informal settings.

Which is more common: "are without" or "lack"?

While both are correct, "lack" is generally more frequently used. "Are without" tends to be more formal and can add emphasis to the absence.