are equivalent with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are equivalent with" is not correct in standard written English; the correct form is "are equivalent to." You can use it when comparing two things that have the same value, meaning, or effect.
Example: "In mathematics, the two expressions are equivalent to each other, yielding the same result."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components are equivalent with BMI of less than 37.5.

Harvard University

Concerning the residence time distribution compartment reactors, static mixer and pneumatic agitated tubular reactor are equivalent with a cascade of four CSTR.

Chemical Engineering Science

Therefore they are equivalent with respect to this aspect.

Boundary Value Problems

Therefore, (I^{alpha}_{-infty}) and (H^{alpha}) are equivalent with equivalent semi-norm and norm.

Boundary Value Problems

Hence, the boundary conditions (4.3) or (4.6) are equivalent with (5.26).

Advances in Difference Equations

Two worlds are equivalent with respect to the question Q if they receive the same answer in both worlds.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

If democracy was equivalent with elections in general, Iran would be considered a democracy, wouldn't it?

The New York Times

Both groups were found to be equivalent with respect to age, parity, concomitant surgery, and menopausal and hormone replacement status.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Both methods were equivalent with regards to the gold standard, but the semiautomatic method was more accurate.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

But its cardinal principles that thinness is equivalent with morality and that the body needs to be controlled at all costs—are powerfully embedded in everyday life.

The New Yorker

That way, the groups being compared should be equivalent, with no group healthier or sicker, or older or younger, than another on average.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing two items, use "are equivalent to" rather than "are equivalent with" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, say "These methods are equivalent to each other".

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "with" after "equivalent". Always use "to" to maintain grammatical accuracy. Saying "equivalent with" is a common error that undermines clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are equivalent with" functions as a predicate adjective, aiming to describe a state of equivalence between two or more entities. However, it's grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the correct form is "are equivalent to."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

74%

Academia

16%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are equivalent with" is frequently encountered across various sources, including scientific and academic texts, it's considered grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, the proper phrasing is "are equivalent to". It aims to express a state of equality or interchangeability, and its usage spans various contexts; science being the most frequent one. When aiming for grammatical precision, especially in formal writing, it's best to opt for alternatives like "are equal to" or "are the same as".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are equal to

Replaces 'equivalent with' to use a more grammatically standard phrase indicating direct equality.

are the same as

Expresses that the compared items share identical characteristics or values, offering a simpler alternative.

are interchangeable with

Highlights the ability to substitute one item for another without affecting the outcome.

are analogous to

Suggests a similarity that allows for comparison, though not necessarily a direct equivalence.

are comparable to

Indicates that items can be compared because they share key features, without implying exact equivalence.

correspond to

Focuses on a matching relationship between two things, often in terms of structure or function.

are commensurate with

Implies a proportional relationship or correspondence in measure or degree.

are on par with

Suggests a similar level of quality or performance.

are uniform with

Indicates consistency or conformity across different instances or aspects.

are symbiotic with

Denotes a mutual relationship where both things benefits from each other.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "are equivalent with"?

No, the grammatically correct phrasing is "are equivalent to". While "are equivalent with" is sometimes used, it is considered non-standard.

What's the difference between "are equivalent to" and "are equal to"?

Both phrases indicate similarity in value or meaning. "Are equivalent to" is often used in technical or mathematical contexts, while "are equal to" can be used more broadly.

When should I use "are interchangeable with" instead of "are equivalent to"?

"Are equivalent to" implies the same value or effect, while "are interchangeable with" suggests that two things can be used in place of each other without changing the outcome.

What are some alternatives to "are equivalent to"?

Depending on the specific context, you could use phrases like "are the same as", "are comparable to", or "correspond to".