are comparable to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are comparable to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when drawing a comparison between two or more items, indicating that they share similar qualities or characteristics. Example: "The two theories are comparable to each other in terms of their foundational principles."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Prices are comparable to Starbucks.

The New York Times - Travel

"I think the prices are comparable to other places.

The New York Times

Those ratings are comparable to an Academy Awards broadcast.

The New York Times

"They are comparable to a fireworks display," Ms. Levy said.

The New York Times

are comparable to currently available commercial systems.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

These are comparable to conventional ITO films.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The activities are comparable to styrene epoxidation.

AMB Express

These values are comparable to earlier studies.

Aeolian Research

The next-generation infotainment systems are comparable to mini-PCs.

TechCrunch

Returns also are comparable to the industry average.

TechCrunch

Imaging characteristics are comparable to those of acute osteomyelitis.

Insights into Imaging

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are comparable to", ensure that the items being compared share enough relevant qualities to make the comparison meaningful and informative.

Common error

Avoid using "are comparable to" when the similarities are superficial or insignificant. Ensure a genuine basis for comparison exists to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are comparable to" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It is used to indicate that two or more things share similar characteristics or qualities. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are comparable to" is a grammatically sound and frequently used comparative expression. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to draw parallels between subjects, emphasizing shared characteristics. It's prevalent in scientific, news, and business contexts, and should be used when a meaningful comparison can be established. While versatile, avoid overstating the degree of similarity for clarity and credibility. Consider alternatives like "are similar to" or "are equivalent to" for nuanced comparisons.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are equivalent to

Indicates a strict equality or interchangeability in value or function.

are similar to

Focuses on general resemblance, without necessarily implying precise equivalence.

are much the same as

Emphasizes a high degree of similarity, almost to the point of being indistinguishable.

are analogous to

Suggests a deeper, more structural similarity, often used in technical or analytical contexts.

correspond to

Indicates a direct relationship or matching of characteristics.

are on par with

Implies that something meets a certain standard or level of quality.

parallel to

Suggests similarity or correspondence.

are alike in

Highlights specific similarities between items, often followed by a description of those shared attributes.

bear comparison with

Suggests that a comparison is valid or worthwhile, inviting further analysis.

approximate to

Implies that something is close to, but not exactly the same as, something else.

FAQs

How to use "are comparable to" in a sentence?

Use "are comparable to" to highlight similarities between two or more subjects. For example, "The prices "are comparable to" Starbucks".

What can I say instead of "are comparable to"?

You can use alternatives like "are similar to", "are equivalent to", or "are on par with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are comparable to" or "are compare to"?

"Are comparable to" is the correct form. "Are compare to" is grammatically incorrect because it misses the -able suffix, which turns "compare" into an adjective.

What's the difference between "are comparable to" and "are related to"?

"Are comparable to" implies a degree of similarity or equivalence, while "are related to" indicates a connection or association, which may not necessarily involve similarity.