are equal to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are equal to" is correct and usable in written English, and can be used to express equivalence between two people or things.
For example: "The salaries of both employees are equal to each other."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Euclids notion: things are equal to a common thing are equal to each other.

Harvard University

We must prove we are equal to that challenge".

The New York Times

(One hundred basis points are equal to 1percentt).

The New York Times

Three MIT credit units are equal to one semester hour.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This apart, all men are equal to each other, equal.

Columbia University

Remember, the determinants are equal to areas up to sine.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

But how many streams are equal to one digital sale?

The New York Times

"To us, these bases are equal to U.S. soil".

The New York Times - Magazine

"They said: 'You are equal to the Americans.

The New York Times

Britain's banking liabilities are equal to some 4.5 times GDP.

The Economist

The best of Ashbery's poems are equal to their moment in the way that Merce Cunningham and John Cage are equal to theirs.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are equal to", ensure that the subjects being compared are of the same type and that the comparison is logical. For example, "The area of this square and the area of that rectangle are equal to each other".

Common error

Avoid using "are equal to" when comparing things that cannot be quantitatively or qualitatively equated. For example, avoid saying "His dedication and her intelligence are equal to each other"; instead, use a more appropriate comparison or different phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are equal to" functions as a relational phrase, linking two or more entities that share the same value, quantity, or characteristic. It is commonly used to express equivalence or sameness, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are equal to" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to denote equivalence between two or more subjects. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread applicability across diverse contexts. As demonstrated by the numerous examples, it is frequently employed in academic, scientific, and journalistic writing. When using "are equal to", ensure logical comparisons are being made. While alternatives like "are equivalent to" or "are the same as" exist, "are equal to" remains a clear and effective way to express sameness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are equivalent to

Replaces "equal" with "equivalent", emphasizing sameness in value or measure.

are identical to

Emphasizes exact correspondence, stronger than "equal".

are the same as

Uses simpler language to express identity or indistinguishability.

are on par with

Indicates that something is at the same level or standard.

are comparable to

Suggests a likeness sufficient for comparison, but not necessarily exact equality.

are commensurate with

Implies a proportional or corresponding relationship.

are alike in

Highlights shared characteristics or features.

correspond to

Suggests a direct relationship or matching quality.

match

A simpler verb indicating equivalence or agreement.

are consistent with

Highlights agreement or lack of contradiction.

FAQs

How to use "are equal to" in a sentence?

Use "are equal to" to express that two or more things have the same value or quantity. For example, "In this equation, the left side and the right side "are equal to" each other".

What can I say instead of "are equal to"?

You can use alternatives like "are equivalent to", "are the same as", or "are identical to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are equal to" or "equals"?

"Are equal to" is a phrase used to compare two quantities or values, while "equals" is a verb form used to state that one quantity is the same as another. For example, "Five plus five equals ten" versus "Five plus five and ten "are equal to" each other".

What's the difference between "are equal to" and "are similar to"?

"Are equal to" indicates that two things have the exact same value or quantity. "Are similar to" indicates that two things have some characteristics in common but are not exactly the same.