are corroborated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are corroborated with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would be "are corroborated by" or "are corroborated with evidence." Example: "The findings of the study are corroborated by previous research conducted in the field."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

Numerical results are corroborated with experiments.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Results are corroborated with numerical simulations.

Chemical Engineering Science

The results are corroborated with testing and modeling of propylene oxidation on the Pt/Al2O3 catalyst.

Catalysis Today

The theoretical predictions are corroborated with detailed finite-element simulations for different indenter geometries.

Acta Materialia

The numerical results are corroborated with experimental data, obtaining a satisfactory agreement along the loading procedure.

Composite Structures

Kinetics of Li+ intercalation/deintercalation mechanism are corroborated with structural changes of the cathode materials during electrochemical reactions.

Electrochimica Acta

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

These have been corroborated with conventional analyses.

Microporous and Mesoporous Materials

This transmission of trauma has been corroborated with research.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The numerical models were corroborated with experimental tests results.

Composite Structures

Their accounts were corroborated with residents and local government officials.

The Guardian

These findings were corroborated with 3H-fluconazole sequestration data (Fig. 5b).

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer "are corroborated by" for grammatically correct sentences.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "corroborated"; the correct preposition is usually "by". For example, use "The findings are corroborated by the evidence" instead of "The findings are corroborated with the evidence."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are corroborated with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something is being confirmed or supported. However, Ludwig AI notes that the standard and preferred form is "are corroborated by".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

96%

News & Media

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are corroborated with" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI indicates that it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The preferred and more standard phrasing is "are corroborated by". If using "with", it should be followed by the specific evidence doing the corroborating. This analysis is based on a review of numerous examples, predominantly from scientific publications. Therefore, writers should exercise caution and consider using the more conventional "are corroborated by" for improved clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are supported by

This alternative replaces "corroborated" with a more general term for providing evidence or backing.

are confirmed by

This suggests a stronger level of verification, implying definitive proof.

are substantiated by

Focuses on providing evidence to prove the truth of something.

are validated by

Emphasizes the process of checking or proving the accuracy of something.

are verified by

Implies a formal process of checking and confirming the accuracy of something.

are borne out by

Suggests that the evidence supports or confirms the original statement.

are backed up by

Offers a more informal way of saying that something is supported by evidence.

find support in

This construction shifts the focus to where the support is found, rather than what provides the corroboration.

align with

This alternative implies an agreement or correspondence between the initial data and supporting facts.

are in agreement with

Highlights that the results correspond with external evidence.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "corroborate"?

The verb "corroborate" typically takes "by" as the preposition to indicate what provides the confirmation. For example, "The witness statement was corroborated by security footage".

Is it ever correct to say "are corroborated with"?

While less common, "are corroborated with evidence" is acceptable, where "evidence" specifies what provides the corroboration. However, it is generally safer to use "are corroborated by".

What can I say instead of "are corroborated with"?

You can use alternatives like "are supported by", "are confirmed by", or "are substantiated by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are corroborated by" or "are corroborated with"?

"Are corroborated by" is the standard and grammatically preferred construction. "Are corroborated with" is acceptable only when you specify what you are corroborating with, for example, "are corroborated with new evidence".