are compared to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are compared to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to compare two things. For example, "We compared the prices of these two products to see which one was better value."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These results are compared to simulations with comparable model parameters.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The results are compared to theoretical predictions.

Princeton University

But how crabbed our memoirists' ambitions are compared to his!

The New York Times - Books

The results are compared to several standard model predictions.

Princeton University

The results are compared to the predictions.

International Journal of Solids and Structures

The predictions are compared to Galileo measurements.

Advances in Space Research

Simulation results are compared to measurements.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

The results are compared to numerical solutions.

Journal of Membrane Science

Simulations are compared to measurement results.

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

Data are compared to predictions of simulation.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

The results are compared to recent experiments.

Journal of the European Ceramic Society

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are compared to", ensure that the basis for comparison is clear to avoid ambiguity. Specify the criteria or aspects being compared for better clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "are compared to" when you intend to say "are comparable to". The former implies a process of evaluation, while the latter indicates a state of similarity. Use "are comparable to" when describing inherent similarities rather than an active comparison.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are compared to" functions as a passive construction used to express a comparison between two or more entities. It highlights the process of evaluating similarities or differences. This aligns with Ludwig AI's assessment that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

28%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are compared to" is a versatile construction used to indicate the process of drawing comparisons between two or more subjects. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and widely applicable. Found frequently in scientific, news, and academic contexts, it serves to contextualize findings and highlight relationships. When using this phrase, ensure the basis for comparison is explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity. For variations, consider alternatives such as "are contrasted with" (for emphasizing differences) or "are evaluated against" (for formal assessments). Misunderstanding the direction of comparison is a common pitfall, so be mindful of whether you intend to describe a process of comparison or a state of inherent similarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are benchmarked against

This alternative implies a formal comparison against a standard or benchmark.

are evaluated against

This alternative suggests a formal assessment based on specific criteria.

are contrasted with

This alternative emphasizes the differences between the subjects being compared.

are assessed in relation to

This alternative focuses on how the subjects are judged within a specific context.

are likened to

This alternative indicates a comparison that highlights similarities, often metaphorical.

are analogous to

This alternative suggests a parallel or resemblance in certain aspects.

are commensurate with

This alternative implies that the subjects are proportional or equivalent in some way.

are weighed against

This alternative indicates a careful consideration of the relative importance of each subject.

are balanced with

This alternative emphasizes equilibrium or equivalence between the subjects.

are juxtaposed with

This alternative suggests placing the subjects side by side to highlight their differences.

FAQs

How can I use "are compared to" in a sentence?

The phrase "are compared to" is used to show similarities or differences between two or more things. For instance, "The simulation results "are compared to" experimental data to validate the model".

What is a more formal alternative to "are compared to"?

For a more formal tone, you could use phrases like "are benchmarked against" or "are evaluated against", especially when discussing standards or criteria.

When is it appropriate to use "are contrasted with" instead of "are compared to"?

Use "are contrasted with" when you want to emphasize the differences between two things, rather than simply noting their similarities or evaluating them.

What's the difference between "are compared to" and "are comparable to"?

"Are compared to" implies an action of comparing, while ""are comparable to"" suggests that the items share similar qualities or characteristics. The first is a process, the second a state.