Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are common enough
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are common enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something occurs frequently or is widely accepted to a certain degree. Example: "These types of errors are common enough in beginner programming courses that instructors often provide additional resources to help students."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
54 human-written examples
But staggered releases are common enough.
News & Media
Believe me, Hank, these are common enough.
News & Media
Mendacious politicians are common enough, and easily dealt with.
News & Media
The first two are common enough around the world.
News & Media
Such triumphs of optimism over experience are common enough.
News & Media
Most crashes are harmless, but minor fractures are common enough.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
5 human-written examples
That is common enough anywhere.
News & Media
Post-collegiate angst — that's common enough.
News & Media
Such conspiracy theory thinking is common enough.
News & Media
It's common enough, as journalists know.
News & Media
Historically, snow in March and April is common enough.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are common enough", ensure that the context clearly establishes what standard or expectation is being met. For instance, "Security breaches of this kind are common enough that companies should invest in robust cybersecurity measures" clarifies the implication.
Common error
Avoid using "are common enough" without supporting evidence or a clear basis for comparison. Overstating the prevalence can mislead readers. Instead, provide context or data to justify the claim.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are common enough" functions as a qualifier, indicating that something occurs with sufficient frequency or prevalence. It modifies a preceding noun phrase, suggesting that the instances of the subject are not rare or unusual. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
82%
Science
12%
Encyclopedias
4%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
Wiki
1%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are common enough" is a versatile qualifier used to indicate that something occurs with sufficient frequency or prevalence, as supported by Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples. It is grammatically correct and widely accepted, lending itself well to various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science and Encyclopedias. While other phrases like "are sufficiently common" or "are fairly typical" can serve as alternatives, "are common enough" retains a straightforward and understandable quality. Remember to provide context when using the phrase to avoid ambiguity and ensure that it accurately reflects the prevalence being described.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are sufficiently common
Replaces 'enough' with 'sufficiently', maintaining a formal tone but emphasizing adequacy.
are generally prevalent
Indicates widespread existence, with a more formal tone than "are common enough".
are adequately frequent
Substitutes both 'common' and 'enough' to convey a sense of sufficient frequency, altering the word choice significantly.
are suitably frequent
Emphasizes that the frequency is appropriate or meets a certain need or expectation.
are reasonably widespread
Focuses on distribution rather than pure frequency, changing the emphasis slightly.
are widely encountered
Highlights the frequency with which one might come across something, focusing on the experience of encountering it.
are fairly typical
Shifts the focus to typicality instead of frequency, implying that the occurrence is not unusual.
are quite usual
Emphasizes the ordinariness of the occurrence, making it a bit more informal.
are amply typical
A more emphatic way of saying something is typical, replacing 'common' with 'typical' and intensifying 'enough'.
are acceptably ordinary
Highlights that something is within the bounds of what is considered normal, adding a layer of acceptance.
FAQs
How can I use "are common enough" in a sentence?
Use "are common enough" to indicate that something happens frequently or is sufficiently prevalent. For example, "These errors "are common enough" that we need better training."
What can I say instead of "are common enough"?
You can use alternatives like "are sufficiently common", "are fairly typical", or "are generally prevalent" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "are common enough" or "are frequent enough"?
Both "are common enough" and "are frequent enough" are grammatically correct, but they emphasize slightly different aspects. "Are common enough" suggests a broader acceptance or occurrence, while "are frequent enough" focuses more specifically on how often something happens.
What does "are common enough" imply about the subject?
Using "are common enough" implies that the subject occurs with sufficient regularity or prevalence to be considered normal or expected within a specific context, but it does not necessarily mean the subject is overwhelmingly dominant or ubiquitous.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested