are capable enough

USAGE SUMMARY

"are capable enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to express that someone or something has enough ability or strength to do a certain task or complete a certain goal. For example: "The students in my class are capable enough to complete this challenging assignment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Worse, the disparity would foster the misimpression that women and minorities are capable enough to learn in college but not to teach and do research there.

The New York Times

Why should we share it when we are capable enough?" And so the state of Madhya Pradesh petitioned the Supreme Court.

The New York Times

Both are capable enough in moving the ball quickly and fluently from back to front, but, like a golfer tormented by the "yips", they consistently have serious trouble in completing the job.

The Guardian - Sport

This literature surveys Internet of Things oriented architectures that are capable enough to improve the understanding of related tool, technology, and methodology to facilitate developer's requirements.

Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences

Part of that is just the fact that the computers powering the system are capable enough to drive high framerate visuals, on screens with a high resolution that doesn't leave things pixelated.

TechCrunch

But as we've found in our research, the current crop of digital-color presses are capable enough to pay for themselves imaging static jobs of a certain type, though they really shine in that high-end, high-value area for which they were originally conceived, now an even ten years ago.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

"But I am capable enough to make my own decisions.

Independent

"I don't think I was capable enough, confident enough to do it by myself," he added.

The New York Times

I hope that by now I've proved that I'm capable enough to hold down a job and produce good work, without being judged for the bipolar.

The Guardian

'Yes, but I had to do it one day or another.' What would he have done if Alain had not been capable enough to take over?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

One of the enduring criticisms of Rafa Benitez's management is that while his first choice team is capable enough, his squad is too thin – hence the fear that without Steven Gerrard and Fernando Torres, the team has little chance.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are capable enough" when you want to clearly state that someone or something possesses the necessary skills or abilities to accomplish a task or meet a requirement. Ensure the context specifies what they are capable of doing.

Common error

Avoid using "are capable enough" without clearly defining what the subject is capable of. For example, instead of saying "They are capable enough", specify "They are capable enough to manage the project effectively".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are capable enough" functions as an adjectival phrase that describes the sufficient ability or competence of a subject to perform a particular action or fulfill a specific requirement. Ludwig provides examples across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are capable enough" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express that someone or something possesses sufficient ability or competence. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English. While not extremely common, it appears in diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. Alternatives include "are competent enough" or "are skilled enough", depending on the specific nuance intended. When using "are capable enough", ensure that you clearly define what the subject is capable of doing to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are competent enough

Replaces "capable" with "competent", emphasizing the possession of necessary skills.

are skilled enough

Substitutes "capable" with "skilled", highlighting expertise in a specific area.

are qualified enough

Emphasizes that someone meets the necessary criteria or requirements.

are able to

A more concise alternative, focusing on the ability to perform a task.

have the ability to

Rephrases capability as a possessed attribute.

are up to the task

An idiomatic expression suggesting readiness and competence for a challenge.

possess the skills to

Focuses on the skills required for a specific purpose.

are equal to the challenge

Highlights the ability to overcome a specific difficulty or obstacle.

are sufficiently talented

Emphasizes innate talent as the basis of capability.

are well-equipped to

Suggests having the necessary resources and preparation for a task.

FAQs

How can I use "are capable enough" in a sentence?

You can use "are capable enough" to indicate that someone or something possesses the required skills or abilities to perform a task. For instance, "The students "are capable enough" to handle the advanced curriculum".

What are some alternatives to "are capable enough"?

Alternatives include "are competent enough", "are skilled enough", or "are qualified enough". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "are capable enough"?

Yes, "are capable enough" is grammatically correct. It uses the verb "are" with the adjective "capable" and the adverb "enough" to express sufficient ability.

What is the difference between "are capable enough" and "are just capable"?

"Are capable enough" indicates that the subject has more than the bare minimum ability, while "are just capable" suggests the subject barely meets the required level of ability. The first expresses confidence in achieving the task, the second implies a risk of not being able to deliver.