are qualified enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are qualified enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether someone meets the necessary qualifications or standards for a particular role or task. Example: "The candidates we interviewed are qualified enough to handle the responsibilities of the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

They are qualified enough to serve as president, but wildly unqualified to run for president.

The New York Times

"We have proved that we are qualified enough to get rid of terrorism, but the government does not provide us with decent jobs".

The New York Times

Inspectors reported bedsores, falls and infections — the kinds of trouble that some experts say signals a lack of nurses who are qualified enough.

The Washington Post

"The younger generation" — of which Ms. Ryan counts herself a member — "just thinks the pipeline will magically fill up with women who are qualified enough to run for president," she said.

The New York Times

For any given job opening, there are frequently multiple candidates who are qualified enough to do the job.

Forbes

Your customers may even be worried about the risk to their business of not being able to engage and work with you quickly enough, or whether they are qualified enough or can provide the time and support you will need to ensure that you can fully succeed.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Electricians must be qualified enough to help people find out how to save energy and reduce their bills.

University of California, Berkeley

"Once they do, it's up to them to decide whether I was qualified enough to get in".

The New York Times

I was going in to lead a group that, frankly, I wouldn't have been qualified enough to join as a junior person.

The New York Times

Candidates should remember that they were qualified enough to get an interview —that is significant.

Forbes

"I suppose generally some people might say they haven't been qualified enough, maybe they haven't been enough of a face around the world of football.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are qualified enough" when you want to convey that someone meets the minimum requirements or standards for a role or task, but perhaps doesn't exceed them significantly. It implies a satisfactory level of competence.

Common error

Avoid using "are qualified enough" when you want to express exceptional skill or expertise. In such cases, opt for stronger terms like "highly qualified" or "expert".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are qualified enough" primarily functions as a subject complement, describing the subject's state of meeting the minimum required qualifications. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

20%

HuffPost

10%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Science

10%

Forbes

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are qualified enough" is a grammatically sound and usable expression that indicates a sufficient, but not necessarily exceptional, level of competence. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. It's most commonly found in news and media contexts, with a neutral register suitable for various audiences. While not exceedingly frequent, it serves as a useful way to convey that someone meets the minimum requirements for a given role or task.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are sufficiently competent

Focuses on the level of competence, suggesting a standard has been met.

are adequately skilled

Highlights the possession of necessary skills.

are capable enough

Emphasizes the ability to perform a task.

meet the requirements

Indicates that specific criteria have been satisfied.

are up to the task

Suggests readiness and suitability for a particular challenge.

are well-suited

Focuses on appropriateness for a role or situation.

are experienced enough

Highlights the level of practical experience.

are ready for the job

Emphasizes preparedness and availability.

possess the necessary qualifications

Formal way of stating that someone has the right credentials.

are eligible

Focuses on meeting the criteria for consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "are qualified enough" in a sentence?

You can use "are qualified enough" to indicate that someone meets the necessary requirements for a specific role or task. For example: "The candidates we interviewed "are qualified enough" to handle the responsibilities of the position."

What phrases can I use instead of "are qualified enough"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently competent", "adequately skilled", or "capable enough", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "are qualified enough" or "are sufficiently qualified"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "are sufficiently qualified" might sound more formal. "Are qualified enough" implies a minimal acceptable standard, whereas "are sufficiently qualified" can suggest a higher level of preparedness.

What's the difference between "are qualified enough" and "are overqualified"?

"Are qualified enough" means someone meets the basic requirements. "Are overqualified" means someone exceeds the requirements, potentially making them unsuitable due to boredom or higher salary expectations.