are audited for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are audited for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of examining or reviewing something for compliance, accuracy, or quality, typically in a formal or professional context. Example: "The financial records of the company are audited for accuracy and compliance with regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

And its measurements are audited for accuracy.

The New York Times

However, these days universities are audited for both research and teaching.

The Guardian

Schools are audited for every student who attended for just a few days in October.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Outcome measures: Charts were audited for assessment of pain intensity.

Journal of Pediatric Nursing

The Trump campaign has said he's not being audited for returns at least before 2009.

The New York Times

In January, the quality of his reports began to be audited, for reasons that are not entirely clear to him.

The Guardian

In 2011, Google agreed to be audited for 20 years by the F.T.C. after it admitted to using deceptive tactics when starting its Buzz social network.

The New York Times - Tech

This is one of the reasons that there are so many successful appeals, because the tribunal judges read the manual". In January, the quality of his reports began to be audited, for reasons that are not entirely clear to him.

The Guardian

In addition, $88 billion in contracts and programs, including those for body armor for American soldiers and matériel for Iraqi and Afghan security forces, are being audited for financial irregularities, the officials said.

The New York Times

Subtract another 0.5x EBITDA if your financials cannot be audited (for whatever reason).

Forbes

"I had a client who found out that she was being audited for unpaid taxes from four years ago from a business she used to be in with an ex-partner," Simmons said.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are audited for", ensure the subject is clearly defined. State explicitly what aspects are being assessed, such as accuracy, compliance, or performance.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by specifying the 'what' and 'why' of the audit. For instance, instead of 'the process is audited', specify 'the process is audited for efficiency and regulatory compliance'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are audited for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject undergoes a process of formal examination or verification. As Ludwig AI confirms, this construction is grammatically correct and appears in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are audited for" is a grammatically sound passive construction employed to indicate a formal review or examination process. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and common usage across diverse professional contexts, especially in news, science, and business. The phrase suggests accountability and verification. While correct, ensure clarity by specifying what is being audited and for what purpose. Alternatives like ""are reviewed for"" or ""are scrutinized for"" can be used depending on the desired level of intensity in the assessment.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are reviewed for

Signifies a general assessment or evaluation, less rigorous than an audit.

are scrutinized for

Highlights a detailed and critical examination, more intense than a regular audit.

are checked for

Suggests a simple verification process, compared to a comprehensive audit.

are verified for

Focuses on proving the truth or accuracy of something.

are supervised for

Emphasizes oversight and control, differing from a formal examination.

are validated for

Implies confirmation of accuracy or legitimacy through testing.

are substantiated for

Focuses on providing evidence to support claims, versus a systematic review.

are ascertained for

Implies a process of finding something out for certain, changing the original nuance.

are monitored for

Refers to ongoing observation, unlike a periodic audit.

are inspected for

Suggests a physical examination or check, unlike a document-based audit.

FAQs

How can I use "are audited for" in a sentence?

Use "are audited for" to indicate a formal examination or review is conducted to ensure compliance, accuracy, or quality. For example, "The company's financial records "are audited for" accuracy annually."

What's a good alternative to "are audited for"?

Alternatives include "are reviewed for", "are examined for", or "are scrutinized for", depending on the context and the level of detail in the assessment.

Which is correct, "are audited for compliance" or "are audited to ensure compliance"?

"Are audited for compliance" is more concise and grammatically sound. "Are audited to ensure compliance" is also correct, but slightly more verbose. The former is generally preferred in formal writing.

What's the difference between "are inspected" and "are audited for"?

"Are inspected" generally refers to a physical examination or check, while ""are audited for"" typically involves a systematic review of records, processes, or performance metrics.