are reviewed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are reviewed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of evaluating or examining something for a specific purpose or criteria. Example: "All applications are reviewed for completeness before being considered for the next stage of the selection process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

SAT questions are reviewed for Eurocentrism, too.

The New York Times

Early stage trials are reviewed for safety.

Neurotherapeutics

Its findings of fact are reviewed for clear error.

Harvard University

No applications are reviewed for spring semester admission.

Columbia University

Events submitted are reviewed for appropriateness and accuracy before posting.

Cornell University

Underlying factual findings are reviewed for clear error, Balen v. Holland Am.

Harvard University

In most fields, applications are reviewed for admission on a rolling basis.

Cornell University

Its legal determinations are reviewed de novo, but its factual findings are reviewed for clear error.

Cornell University

Applications are reviewed for admission and decisions are released on a rolling basis.

University of California, Berkeley

After February 1, in most fields, applications are reviewed for admission on a rolling basis.

Cornell University

Equations are reviewed for elastic waves propagating along a lossless circular cylinder.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are reviewed for", clearly state the criteria or purpose of the review to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are reviewed for" without specifying what aspects are being assessed. For example, instead of saying "Applications are reviewed", specify "Applications are reviewed for completeness and eligibility."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are reviewed for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject is being examined or evaluated in relation to a specific criterion or purpose. Ludwig shows that the phrase is commonly used to describe processes of assessment, evaluation, and inspection across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

40%

Science

40%

News & Media

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are reviewed for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression in English, as confirmed by Ludwig. It indicates a process of examination or evaluation based on specific criteria. As Ludwig AI points out, it functions as a passive construction, commonly employed across academic, scientific, and news-related contexts. To ensure clarity, specify the criteria for the review. Alternatives such as "are assessed for", "are evaluated for", and "are examined for" provide similar meanings with slightly different nuances. This phrase maintains a neutral to formal register and is widely applicable in professional and academic writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are assessed for

Focuses on evaluation against a specific standard or criteria.

are evaluated for

Emphasizes a more thorough and comprehensive judgment.

are examined for

Highlights a detailed inspection or investigation.

are checked for

Suggests a verification process to ensure correctness or completeness.

are inspected for

Implies a formal or official examination.

are screened for

Indicates a filtering process to identify specific characteristics.

are audited for

Refers to a systematic and independent examination of records.

are analyzed for

Highlights a detailed study and interpretation of data.

are investigated for

Suggests a formal inquiry into a situation or issue.

are scrutinized for

Implies a very careful and critical examination.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "are reviewed for"?

You can use alternatives like "are assessed for", "are evaluated for", or "are examined for" depending on the context.

How to use "are reviewed for" in a sentence?

Use "are reviewed for" to indicate that something is being examined or evaluated based on specific criteria. For example, "Study proposals are reviewed for scientific quality and the likelihood that they will yield data on meaningful benefits".

What's the difference between "are reviewed for" and "are considered for"?

"Are reviewed for" implies a systematic evaluation based on specific criteria, while "are considered for" suggests a more general assessment or deliberation.

Is it correct to say "are reviewed by" instead of "are reviewed for"?

While "are reviewed by" indicates who is conducting the review, "are reviewed for" specifies the purpose or criteria of the review. They serve different grammatical functions and are not interchangeable.