are ascertained for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are ascertained for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of determining or establishing something for a specific purpose or context. Example: "The necessary data are ascertained for the completion of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

The affected individuals and their parents are all genotyped, whereas only the parents of unaffected individuals are genotyped, although exposures are ascertained for both affected and unaffected offspring.

The American Journal of Human Genetics

The branching perspective of CTL is more suitable for verifying correctness of a safety critical system because all possible states in all possible computational paths are ascertained for the absence of a safety negating state.

Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling

The variable coastal reservoir effect should be kept in mind when radiocarbon dating marine samples, pottery or human bones from coastal sites, as coast-near fishing and shell collection are ascertained for many prehistoric periods.

Heritage Science

Therefore, exposure is estimated on an ecological level while health outcomes are ascertained for each subject.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

If multiple events are ascertained, for example a revascularization, myocardial infarction, a stroke, and heart failure, only one is represented in the analysis.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The data collection began in October 1974, and data such as maternal history, pregnancy complications, and delivery details are ascertained for each patient.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Many great works of painting and sculpture, for example, were created to glorify a deity and not, insofar as can be ascertained, for an aesthetic purpose (to be enjoyed simply in the contemplation of them for their own sake).

Encyclopedia Britannica

RAAS-modifying pharmacotherapies have been ascertained for the reduction of renal damage after radiation in animal models.

EJNMMI Research

The productivity of the catalysts was ascertained for various metal and HPC combinations and a range of reaction conditions.

Catalysis Today

Efficiency was ascertained for five wind velocities (range: 1 5 m s− 1) and eight grain size classes (range: 10 89 μm).

Geomorphology

The impact of the studied factors could not be ascertained for the shear resistance of the adhesive coating.

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are ascertained for", ensure that the context clearly defines what is being determined and the purpose of that determination. For example, "Specific risk factors are ascertained for each patient."

Common error

Avoid using "are ascertained for" in casual or informal writing. The phrase is generally more appropriate for technical, scientific, or formal contexts. In simpler situations, alternatives like "are determined" or "are found" may be more suitable.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "are ascertained for" is to form the passive voice of a verb phrase, indicating that a subject receives the action of being determined or established for a specific purpose. As confirmed by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are ascertained for" is a grammatically sound passive construction primarily used in formal and scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and serves to indicate that information or conditions are precisely determined for a specific purpose. While alternatives like "are determined for" or "are established for" exist, the specific nuance of "ascertained" implies a careful and methodical process of discovery or confirmation. It's crucial to reserve its use for appropriate settings, avoiding it in informal or casual writing where simpler alternatives would suffice. This usage is supported by numerous examples from scientific journals and research publications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are determined for

Replaces "ascertained" with "determined", indicating a more direct act of finding something out.

are established for

Substitutes "ascertained" with "established", emphasizing the act of setting something firmly in place or proving it.

are identified for

Uses "identified" instead of "ascertained", highlighting the recognition of something specific.

are verified for

Replaces "ascertained" with "verified", focusing on confirming the truth or accuracy of something.

are confirmed for

Similar to "verified", but "confirmed" suggests a stronger level of certainty.

are validated for

Focuses on the process of checking or proving the validity of something for a specific purpose.

are discovered for

Implies an element of finding something new, rather than simply confirming something already suspected.

are diagnosed for

Suggests the identification of a condition or problem for a specific reason.

are measured for

Highlights the act of quantifying something in relation to a particular standard.

are evaluated for

Implies a thorough assessment or appraisal of something for a defined objective.

FAQs

How can I use "are ascertained for" in a sentence?

Use "are ascertained for" to describe a process where facts or data are established or determined for a particular reason. For example, "The patient's vital signs "are ascertained for" monitoring purposes".

What is a simpler way to say "are ascertained for"?

Alternatives include "are determined for", "are established for", or "are identified for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "are ascertained for"?

This phrase is best used in formal or technical writing, particularly in scientific, medical, or legal contexts where precise determination is crucial. Avoid using it in informal conversations or casual writing.

Is "are ascertained for" interchangeable with "are assessed for"?

While both phrases involve evaluation, "are assessed for" implies a more general appraisal or judgment, whereas "are ascertained for" suggests a more precise determination of specific facts or values. Choose based on the level of precision required.