are identified for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are identified for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying the purpose or reason for identifying something or someone. Example: "The candidates are identified for their exceptional skills and experience in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

But as more genes are identified for late-onset diseases, the question will come up again and again.

The New York Times

"It is important to note that this is a voluntary process for Oregon citizens and residents who are identified for interviews and are not criminal suspects".

The New York Times

are identified for use in intelligent agents.

Future Generation Computer Systems

Three reaction limits are identified for these flames.

Combustion and Flame

Two RC time constants are identified for this system.

Electrochimica Acta

Weibull parameters are identified for the data sets and compared.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Eight conformers are identified for 4,4′-MDI.

Polymer

Finally, several points are identified for future research.

Computers & Chemical Engineering

Appropriate numerical methods are identified for each of these subsystems.

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Future areas are identified for developing the algebra.

Building and Environment

Five primary design elements are identified for facilitating such climates.

Business Horizons

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are identified for", ensure the reason or purpose for the identification is clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are identified for" without specifying the criteria or purpose. For instance, instead of saying "Potential candidates are identified for the role", specify "Potential candidates are identified for the role based on their experience and skills."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are identified for" functions as a passive construction indicating that something or someone has been recognized or distinguished for a particular purpose or characteristic. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and frequently used in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

13%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are identified for" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression that serves to specify the reason or purpose behind recognizing something or someone. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's best practice to ensure that the criteria for identification are clearly stated to avoid vagueness. This expression is most frequently found in scientific and news-related contexts, making it suitable for formal and neutral communications. When you need alternatives, consider options like "are recognized as" or "are designated to" to adjust the emphasis of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are recognized as

Focus shifts to acknowledgment or public knowledge of a quality or role.

are selected for

Highlights the act of choosing something or someone from a larger group.

are designated to

Emphasizes a formal assignment or appointment for a specific purpose.

are classified as

Focuses on placing something into a specific category based on shared characteristics.

are singled out for

Highlights the act of choosing someone or something for special attention or treatment.

are known as

Indicates a common name or title that something or someone is referred to.

are pinpointed for

Emphasizes the act of precisely locating or determining something for a reason.

are specified for

Indicates that something is explicitly mentioned or required for a certain purpose.

are earmarked for

Highlights a specific allocation or reservation for a particular purpose.

are distinguished by

Focuses on unique qualities that set something or someone apart.

FAQs

How can I use "are identified for" in a sentence?

Use "are identified for" to show the purpose or reason behind recognizing something or someone. For example, "These genes are identified for their role in disease development."

What are some alternatives to "are identified for"?

You can use alternatives like "are recognized as", "are designated to", or "are selected for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "were identified for" instead of "are identified for"?

Yes, "were identified for" is correct when referring to a past event or situation, while "are identified for" is used for present or ongoing situations. For example, "The issues were identified for further investigation last year."

What's the difference between "are identified for" and "are known for"?

"Are identified for" implies a process of discovery or recognition, whereas "are known for" suggests a pre-existing reputation or characteristic. For instance, "The scientists are identified for their groundbreaking research" versus "The scientists are known for their expertise in the field".