agreed on everything

USAGE SUMMARY

"agreed on everything" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It means that all parties involved have come to a mutual understanding or have reached a consensus on a particular topic or issue. Example: After hours of discussion, the two parties finally agreed on everything and signed the contract.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

Not that the two have agreed on everything.

The New York Times

"This is the first record that my label and I have agreed on everything.

The Guardian - Music

Pacquiao and Mayweather agreed on everything else.

The New York Times

Cashman recalled the year when he and George agreed on everything, but there was something else.

The New York Times - Sports

Within the first three days, we had agreed on everything with the club.

The Guardian - Sport

We thought we could manage it because we agreed on everything.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Which one of us agrees on everything with any other single person?

Huffington Post

No one expects us to agree on everything.

The Guardian

Shouldn't agree on everything.

Independent

Ain't gotta agree on everything.

Independent

But they don't agree on everything.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "agreed on everything" to clearly indicate that all parties have reached a complete consensus and there are no remaining points of contention.

Common error

Avoid using "agreed on everything" if there are minor details still under discussion; the phrase implies a comprehensive and total agreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "agreed on everything" functions as a concise way to express complete consensus or unanimity among multiple parties. It signifies that all differences have been resolved and that all parties share the same viewpoint on a particular matter.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

66.66%

Wiki

33.33%

Encyclopedias

0.01%

Less common in

Science

0.01%

Formal & Business

0.01%

Reference

0.01%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "agreed on everything" is a phrase used to indicate complete consensus among parties, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Although grammatically correct and understandable, it's relatively rare. Predominantly found in news and media, its formality is neutral, suitable for various communication scenarios. When using this phrase, ensure it accurately reflects a total agreement to avoid misrepresentation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reached a consensus on all points

Replaces "agreed" with "reached a consensus" and specifies "all points" for emphasis.

were in complete agreement

Emphasizes the state of being in agreement rather than the action of agreeing.

saw eye to eye on every matter

Uses an idiomatic expression to convey complete agreement.

were of one mind

Highlights the unity of thought and opinion.

found complete accord

Substitutes "agreement" with the more formal "accord".

concurred on all aspects

Uses the verb "concurred" to express agreement, specifying "all aspects" for completeness.

resolved all differences

Focuses on the elimination of disagreements leading to complete agreement.

were unanimous in their decision

Implies that everyone involved agreed without exception.

came to a full understanding

Emphasizes the comprehensive nature of the agreement and mutual comprehension.

settled on every detail

Highlights the agreement on even the smallest elements.

FAQs

How can I use "agreed on everything" in a sentence?

You can use "agreed on everything" to indicate that all parties involved have reached a complete consensus. For example, "After lengthy negotiations, the team "agreed on everything" and signed the contract."

What are some alternatives to saying "agreed on everything"?

Alternatives include "reached a consensus", "were in complete agreement", or "saw eye to eye", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it an overstatement to use "agreed on everything"?

Yes, using "agreed on everything" can be an overstatement if there are even minor points of disagreement or if details still need to be worked out. Use it only when there is truly a comprehensive consensus.

What is the difference between "agreed on everything" and "agreed on most things"?

"Agreed on everything" implies complete unanimity, whereas "agreed on most things" suggests that there were some points of disagreement or unresolved issues. The former indicates a full consensus, and the latter suggests a partial one.