were in complete agreement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were in complete agreement" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that two or more parties share the same opinion or viewpoint on a particular matter. Example: "After a lengthy discussion, the committee members were in complete agreement about the proposed changes to the policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

First American, in a statement, disputed "some of the individual findings" by the regulators but said they were "in complete agreement" with Mr. Kreidler's proposals.

The New York Times

The Knicks were so concerned that they released a joint statement from Dolan, Walsh and D'Antoni, insisting that they were "in complete agreement" and that no one outside the organization (meaning Thomas) was involved.

The New York Times - Sports

They were in complete agreement.

The New York Times

The director and the playwright were in complete agreement.

The New York Times

She & her parents were in complete agreement on this.

The New Yorker

But from the start, and through this ordeal, we were in complete agreement.

The New York Times

Here, too, they were in complete agreement: the Soviet state was beyond redemption and Soviet society was degenerate.

The New Yorker

She raised the subject and I was ready for her with materials but for once we were in complete agreement.

Independent

"I did some market research as to whether people find her as attractive as I do and all, including Vidia [Naipaul], were in complete agreement".

The Guardian

The ambassador said the US and EU were in complete agreement that stronger sanctions could follow after next weekend's referendum, adding: "There is no daylight between us".

The Guardian

At the end of last week, they took the unusual step of issuing a joint declaration insisting that they were in complete agreement over the euro.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the context and intended tone. While generally suitable for formal and neutral situations, more casual alternatives may be better for informal communication.

Common error

Avoid using "were in complete agreement" when there are minor disagreements or reservations. Reserve it for situations where the consensus is truly unanimous. Otherwise, use phrases like "largely agreed" or "generally concurred".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were in complete agreement" functions as a statement of consensus or accord among multiple entities. It emphasizes that there were no dissenting opinions or unresolved issues within the group being discussed. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were in complete agreement" effectively conveys a unanimous consensus. According to Ludwig AI, its use is both grammatically sound and highly practical across diverse written formats. It's important to use it accurately, reserving it for scenarios where true unanimity exists to maintain clarity and credibility. Remember to avoid overuse by considering other ways to express accord, such as those included here ( "were in total agreement" or "were of one mind"). With that said, its high frequency and natural tone make it a strong choice when describing actual full agreement between two or more parties.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were in total agreement

Replaces 'complete' with 'total', emphasizing the full extent of the agreement.

were in full agreement

Substitutes 'complete' with 'full', suggesting a comprehensive agreement without reservations.

were entirely in agreement

Uses 'entirely' to highlight the comprehensive nature of the agreement.

were in unanimous agreement

Indicates that everyone involved agreed, leaving no room for dissent.

were of one mind

Figurative expression meaning they shared the same opinion or perspective.

saw eye to eye

Idiomatic expression for agreeing; slightly less formal.

reached a consensus

Focuses on the process of arriving at an agreement, often after discussion.

were aligned in their views

Highlights the similarity in their opinions or perspectives.

shared a common understanding

Implies agreement based on a mutual comprehension of the issue.

were united in their decision

Suggests a collective agreement towards a specific action or choice.

FAQs

How can I use "were in complete agreement" in a sentence?

You can use "were in complete agreement" to show that multiple parties had no disagreements about a particular issue. For example: "The board members "were in complete agreement" on the budget proposal".

What are some alternatives to "were in complete agreement"?

Alternatives include "were in full agreement", "were in total agreement", or "reached a consensus". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "were in complete agreement" in formal writing?

Yes, "were in complete agreement" is suitable for formal writing. It's a clear and professional way to express unanimous agreement. However, assess if a stronger or weaker expression of agreement fits better, in which case you may want to choose an alternative phrase such as "were mostly in agreement" or "reached an unanimous decision".

What is the difference between "were in complete agreement" and "were mostly in agreement"?

"Were in complete agreement" indicates that there were no disagreements at all. "Were mostly in agreement" suggests that there was general agreement, but there might have been some minor points of contention.