Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
aggregated by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'aggregated by' is correct and usable in written English.
It is generally used to indicate that one entity collected or combined the output from several sources, which could be data, measurements, etc. Example: The user ratings were aggregated by the marketing team to determine the overall sentiment.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The obtained results are aggregated by using the mean aggregation before proceeding to further analysis.
In other words, between RSS feeds aggregated by mobile apps, "Read Later" features, and ad-free web curators, you can enjoy the web without bumping into ads.
News & Media
Data were aggregated by generic medication.
Science
All responses were aggregated by country and qualitatively analyzed.
These can be aggregated by a simple average.
Figure 7 Sources of household income aggregated by sex.
Science
Online media that are free, linkable, embeddable, generated by amateurs and aggregated by emerging entrepreneurs.
News & Media
Moreover, the number of workers and payments could be aggregated by sector and subsector.
News & Media
Classifiers can also be aggregated by means of an efficient and flexible mathematical programming model.
The latexes can be aggregated by N2 and heat, and redispersed through CO2 bubbling and sonication.
Science
Figure 2 shows mid-year reading ability scores aggregated by benchmark expectations.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "aggregated by" to denote a process where individual data points or items are combined into a unified whole, often summarized or represented as a single value or statistic.
Common error
Avoid using "aggregated by" when describing elements that contribute individually to a final outcome without being combined or summarized. Ensure that the elements are truly being merged or summarized, not just contributing separately.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "aggregated by" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a verb or noun, indicating the agent or method responsible for combining individual data points into a summary or overall value. As shown in Ludwig, it is used to describe how information is collected and presented.
Frequent in
Science
68%
News & Media
18%
Formal & Business
14%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "aggregated by" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate that data or information has been combined or summarized by a specific entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used across various domains, especially in scientific and formal contexts. Common usage involves specifying who or what performed the aggregation, ensuring clarity and transparency in data analysis. Remember to differentiate aggregation from individual contributions and to use alternatives like "compiled by" or "summarized by" where appropriate. With its prevalent usage and specific function, mastering "aggregated by" enhances clarity and precision in writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
compiled by
Focuses on the act of gathering information into a single source; less emphasis on combining or averaging.
collected by
Highlights the gathering aspect, suggesting data was brought together from various locations or sources.
summarized by
Implies condensing information into a shorter form by someone, rather than a simple aggregation.
consolidated by
Suggests the unification of separate items into a more effective whole by an actor.
combined by
Emphasizes the merging of distinct elements by someone.
collated by
Focuses on carefully collecting and arranging data in a specific order by an entity.
processed by
Suggests a transformation or manipulation of data after collection by someone.
analyzed by
Highlights the examination and interpretation of data performed by an actor after collection.
gathered and grouped by
More descriptive, specifying both the gathering and organization of information by an agent.
brought together by
Highlights the act of uniting different things or pieces of information by a person or entity.
FAQs
How is "aggregated by" typically used in a sentence?
The phrase "aggregated by" is used to indicate that data or information has been collected and combined into a summary or overall figure by a specific entity. For example, "The survey results were aggregated by the research team to determine overall satisfaction."
What are some alternatives to using "aggregated by"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "compiled by", "collected by", or "summarized by" to convey a similar meaning.
Is there a difference between "aggregated by" and "analyzed by"?
"Aggregated by" refers to the process of combining data, while "analyzed by" implies a deeper examination and interpretation of the data after it has been collected. The two are not interchangeable.
Can "aggregated by" be used in both formal and informal writing?
Yes, "aggregated by" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing, although it is more commonly found in formal or technical contexts such as scientific reports or business analyses.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested