aftermath of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "aftermath of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to the consequences or results that follow an event, often a significant or negative one. Example: "The aftermath of the hurricane left the town in ruins, with many families displaced and infrastructure damaged."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The aftermath of rape is always complicated.

The New Yorker

In the aftermath of heartbreak came foresight.

The New York Times - Sports

Discussion of the aftermath of the blackout.

The New Yorker

The conversation in the aftermath of it.

The New Yorker

6 Aftermath of E.U.

The New York Times

Tells about the aftermath of the Persian Gulf War.

The New Yorker

Sober aftermath of terrorist attacks?

The New York Times

Like the aftermath of full-scale war.

The Guardian

Worth reading in the aftermath of Haiyan.

The Guardian

But the aftermath of their game lingers.

The New York Times - Sports

"And the aftermath of the elections.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "aftermath of", ensure the event you're referring to is clearly defined. This helps readers understand the context of the consequences you're discussing.

Common error

Avoid using "aftermath of" for trivial or insignificant events. This phrase carries a connotation of significant consequences, so reserve it for situations with substantial impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "aftermath of" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun by specifying the period or consequences following a significant event. Ludwig confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "aftermath of" is a commonly used and grammatically correct prepositional phrase that describes the period and consequences following a significant event. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. While alternatives like ""consequences of"" and "results of" exist, "aftermath of" specifically implies a period of disruption and subsequent effects, making it crucial to use the phrase appropriately and avoid applying it to trivial events.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consequences of

Focuses on the direct results or effects stemming from a particular action or event.

results of

Emphasizes the outcomes or end products that arise due to a specific cause or situation.

fallout from

Implies negative or undesirable consequences that spread or emerge after an incident.

wake of

Suggests a period or series of events that immediately follow a significant occurrence.

upshot of

Highlights the final or ultimate result, often after a complex series of developments.

ramifications of

Indicates the complex and far-reaching consequences, often with legal or ethical implications.

sequelae of

Specifically refers to the aftereffects of a disease or injury, particularly long-term complications.

reverberations of

Emphasizes the continuing and widespread effects that echo or resonate after an event.

legacy of

Highlights the long-term impact and lasting effects, especially historical or cultural significance.

chain reaction from

Suggests one event quickly leading to a series of related events.

FAQs

How can I use "aftermath of" in a sentence?

Use "aftermath of" to describe the period or consequences following a significant event. For example, "The "consequences of" the storm were widespread destruction."

What are some alternatives to "aftermath of"?

Alternatives include "results of", "fallout from", or "wake of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "in the aftermath to" instead of "in the aftermath of"?

No, the correct preposition is "of". "In the aftermath to" is grammatically incorrect. Use "in the aftermath of" followed by the event.

What's the difference between "aftermath of" and "impact of"?

"Aftermath of" refers to the period and consequences following an event, while "impact of" refers to the immediate effect or influence something has. The "aftermath" encompasses a broader range of consequences over time.