results of

USAGE SUMMARY

"results of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the outcome of a particular situation or activity. For example, "The results of the experiment were inconclusive."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Results of the brush-off?

The New York Times

Full results of the poll.

The New York Times

— Somini Sengupta Results of A.C.L.U.

The New York Times

Results of tests were mixed.

The Guardian

The results of this experiment are mixed.

The New Yorker

The results of this bright news?

The New York Times - Sports

Tells the results of this year's elections.

The New Yorker

I won the results of their work".

The New York Times - Magazine

The results of the autopsy came.

The New Yorker

The results of that examination are pending.

The New York Times

Whatever the eventual results of Pres.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing experiments or studies, use "results of" to clearly indicate the findings or outcomes. For example, "The "results of" the survey indicate a high level of satisfaction."

Common error

When presenting "results of" a study, be careful not to imply causation unless it's explicitly supported by the methodology. Simply observing a correlation doesn't mean one variable directly caused the other.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "results of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun to specify the outcome or consequence associated with it. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

34%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "results of" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction, widely employed to denote outcomes, consequences, or findings derived from various activities and processes. As Ludwig AI highlights, it’s a common phrase applicable across numerous contexts. Predominantly found in "News & Media" and scientific sources, the phrase maintains a neutral tone suitable for both formal and informal communication. When using "results of", ensure accuracy in presenting data and avoid implying causation without explicit evidence. Remember alternatives like "outcomes from" or "consequences of" can offer subtle shifts in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

outcomes from

Focuses more on the final state achieved, shifting from a process to a direct consequence.

consequences of

Emphasizes the effects that follow a particular action or cause, often with a negative connotation.

effects of

Highlights the impact or influence that something has on a particular situation.

impact of

Stresses the force or significance of an action on something else.

aftermath of

Refers specifically to the period and events following a significant event or disaster.

upshot of

Indicates the final or eventual outcome of a discussion, action, or series of events.

ramifications of

Implies wider, often unforeseen consequences that spread out from an initial action.

sequelae of

Used primarily in medical contexts to refer to conditions resulting from a disease or injury.

products of

Emphasizes the thing that is made, or come out of, a process, or a period of time

yield of

Typically used in contexts relating to agriculture, investments, or production to denote output.

FAQs

How can I use "results of" in a sentence?

You can use "results of" to describe the outcome of a study, experiment, election, or any event where there are measurable consequences. For instance, "The "results of the election" were surprising."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "results of"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "outcomes from", "consequences of", or "effects of" to convey a similar meaning. Each alternative offers a slightly different nuance.

Is it always necessary to specify the source when discussing the "results of" something?

While not always mandatory, specifying the source enhances credibility and allows readers to evaluate the reliability of the results. For example, "According to the study, the "results of the experiment" showed significant improvement."

How do I present the "results of" a research paper effectively?

Clearly and concisely present the key findings, using tables and figures where appropriate. Emphasize the most significant "outcomes from the study" and relate them back to your research question.