adequately tested for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequately tested for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something has been sufficiently evaluated or examined for a specific purpose or condition. Example: "The new software has been adequately tested for security vulnerabilities before its release."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

What's more, most herbs and supplements have not been adequately tested for interactions with other herbs or supplements, drugs, or foods.

Harvard University

Indices based on macrobenthic responses to disturbance remain to be adequately tested for the detection of spatial variability by robust sampling designs.

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Michael Hansen, senior scientist with Consumers Union (publisher of Consumer Reports), contends that GM salmon have the potential to cause allergies and have not been adequately tested for allergenicity.

Columbia University

Scientists said it was both "astonishing" and "alarming" that pesticides used at approved doses could kill a frog within one hour, raising questions about whether pesticides have been adequately tested for safety.

The New York Times - Science

It is deemed harmless by the Food and Drug Administration, but critics say it has not been adequately tested for chain smokers who might use the e-cigarettes during most of their waking hours.

The New York Times

As the capability to automatically generate code from different models becomes more sophisticated, it is critical that these models be adequately tested for quality assurance prior to code generation.

Information and Software Technology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Sample sizes in this study were insufficient to adequately test for sex and age differences.

BMC Ecology

There is an indication that this effect may decline with age but more studies (preferably longitudinal) are needed to adequately test for age-related changes.

European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

To adequately test for species level differences, multiple populations from both species would need to be compared during the same holding experiment.

Evolutionary Applications

The lack of statistically significant results in the ethanol injury-induction assays might result from the limitations of the injury itself, which might not adequately test for the correct pathway or developmental time point that is important for the function of our candidate genes.

DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms

Cynthia Bergman, the E.P.A. spokeswoman, responded with a statement that said, "The final rule will be defined by the availability of technology that has been adequately tested and available for industrywide deployment".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adequately tested for", specify the criteria or standards against which the testing was conducted to provide context and demonstrate the thoroughness of the evaluation.

Common error

Avoid using "adequately tested for" if the testing was preliminary or limited in scope. Ensure the level of testing aligns with the claim being made to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequately tested for" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating that it has undergone a sufficient level of testing to meet certain standards or requirements. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "adequately tested for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that indicates something has undergone sufficient testing to meet specific standards. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. It is most frequently found in scientific, news, and academic contexts, and its usage conveys assurance about the safety or reliability of the subject being discussed. When using this phrase, it's important to specify the standards or criteria against which the testing was conducted to provide context and credibility. Remember to avoid overstating the thoroughness of the testing if it was preliminary or limited in scope.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently evaluated for

Emphasizes the evaluation process, suggesting enough assessment was conducted.

thoroughly examined for

Highlights the depth of the examination, implying a detailed investigation.

properly assessed for

Focuses on the appropriateness of the assessment method used.

rigorously validated for

Stresses the strictness and accuracy of the validation process.

comprehensively analyzed for

Indicates a broad and complete analysis was performed.

fully vetted for

Implies a complete and careful investigation to ensure suitability.

extensively checked for

Highlights the breadth of the checking process.

completely verified for

Focuses on the confirmation and accuracy of the results.

satisfactorily proven for

Emphasizes that something has been proven to a satisfactory level.

reliably confirmed for

Highlights the reliability of the confirmation process.

FAQs

How can I use "adequately tested for" in a sentence?

You can use "adequately tested for" to indicate something has been sufficiently evaluated. For example, "The new drug has been "adequately tested for" side effects before being released to the public."

What are some alternatives to "adequately tested for"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently evaluated for", "thoroughly examined for", or "properly assessed for", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean for something to be "adequately tested for" something?

It means the subject has undergone sufficient testing procedures, to be relatively assured of safety and the product works as expected for a defined purpose.

Is there a difference between "adequately tested for" and "fully tested for"?

While both suggest thoroughness, "adequately tested for" implies the testing met a specific standard or requirement, while "fully tested for" suggests all possible tests were conducted. The term "fully tested for" might be an overstatement if every single test has not been done.