fully tested for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fully tested for" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when expressing that something has been checked or examined to ensure that it is safe and of a good quality. For example, "This new product has been fully tested for safety and security."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

"Virtually none of the chemicals have been fully tested for their effects," he said.

The New York Times

The New York chapter of the American Postal Workers Union filed a suit demanding that the U.S. Postal Service close down the huge Morgan Processing and Distribution Center in midtown until it was fully tested for anthrax.

The New York Times

They cited, among studies, a 2013 report by the Government Accountability Office and the Natural Resources Defense Council, that said thousands of pesticides were approved for use without being fully tested for hazards to human health.

The Washington Post

They cite studies by the Government Accountability Office and the Natural Resources Defense Council, which reported in 2013 that thousands of pesticides were approved for use without being fully tested for hazards to human health.

The Washington Post

"There are estimated to be around 30,000 chemicals that are not fully tested for their toxicological risk," says Jonathan West a microengineer at the University of Dortmund in Germany, who developed the new chip with colleagues.

MIT Technology Review

The links were fully tested for the quality of transmission using the standard test cards for video and audio signals.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

We consider image variability, response imprecision and we use alternative analyses and a guessing correction to fully test for a dissociation between knowing an abnormality is present vs knowing where it is.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

The sample size also may have decreased the likelihood of a wide distribution of nutrient intake to fully test for potential associations.

BMJ Open

As the analyses of repetitive sequences suggested enrichment of purine-rich RNA in these RNA DNA hybrids, this finding was explored more fully, testing for and finding from the genome-wide data a strong intramolecular skewing towards GA CT enrichment (Fig.  4a).

Epigenetics and Chromatin

This is not a legitimate way to fully test for IQ.

WikiHow

The advantage of the presented method is the fast, fully tested procedure for confirmation of detected compound in biological samples.

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing technical documentation, specify the standards or criteria against which something was "fully tested for". This adds credibility and context.

Common error

Avoid stating something is "fully tested for" without specifying the specific parameters or conditions under which the testing occurred. This can lead to misinterpretations and undermine the validity of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fully tested for" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that it has undergone a complete and thorough testing process. As seen in Ludwig, this indicates a level of assurance or validation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

12%

Academia

6%

Science & Research

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "fully tested for" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that something has undergone thorough evaluation to meet specific standards. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to build confidence in a product, system, or process. While the phrase is versatile, it's most frequently found in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. For best practice, specify what the subject was "fully tested for" to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like ""comprehensively tested for"" or "rigorously evaluated for" can offer variety, but maintaining clarity about the testing parameters remains crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Comprehensively tested for

Replaces "fully" with "comprehensively", emphasizing the thoroughness of the testing.

Rigorously evaluated for

Substitutes "tested" with "evaluated" and "fully" with "rigorously", focusing on a formal assessment.

Thoroughly assessed for

Uses "assessed" instead of "tested", highlighting a detailed examination.

Extensively validated for

Replaces "tested" with "validated" and "fully" with "extensively", indicating a confirmation of accuracy.

Completely checked for

Employs "checked" instead of "tested", suggesting a verification process.

Validated for

Shortens the phrase by removing "fully", implying a complete validation.

Evaluated for

Focuses on the evaluation aspect, omitting the intensity implied by "fully".

Screened for

Indicates a filtering process to detect specific characteristics.

Inspected for

Highlights a detailed visual examination for specific issues.

Analyzed for

Focuses on a detailed examination of the components or elements.

FAQs

What does "fully tested for" mean?

The phrase "fully tested for" means something has undergone thorough examination and evaluation to ensure it meets certain standards, requirements, or expectations. It suggests a comprehensive assessment to identify potential issues or verify performance.

How can I use "fully tested for" in a sentence?

You can use "fully tested for" to describe products, software, or systems that have been rigorously evaluated. For example, "The software was "comprehensively tested for" security vulnerabilities."

What are some alternatives to "fully tested for"?

Some alternatives include phrases like "rigorously evaluated for", "thoroughly assessed for", or "extensively validated for", which all emphasize a detailed evaluation process.

Is it always necessary to specify what something is "fully tested for"?

While not always mandatory, specifying the criteria or parameters for which something is "fully tested for" enhances clarity and credibility. It provides context and allows the audience to understand the scope and limitations of the testing.