Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

acknowledged in

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "acknowledged in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been recognized or accepted within a specific context, such as a document, discussion, or field of study. Example: "The findings of the research were acknowledged in the latest scientific journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"We've never really been acknowledged in America.

Their very existence is barely acknowledged in the media.

That was acknowledged in testimony by Ms Yellen.

News & Media

Independent

As she herself acknowledged, in forgiving him, they were "childish".

News & Media

The New Yorker

Other sporting figures were acknowledged in the Australia Day honours.

His achievements were acknowledged in varying ways over the years.

They wanted the existence of Kurds acknowledged in the constitution.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Those who labor backstage are seldom acknowledged in the theater.

Rodriguez acknowledged in February that he had used steroids.

None of these sources are acknowledged in the essay's footnotes.

News & Media

The New York Times

Not that this was acknowledged in his manifesto.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider stronger synonyms if you intend to convey more than simple recognition. Words like "validated", "confirmed", or "celebrated" might be more appropriate depending on your intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "acknowledged in" without specifying where the acknowledgement occurred. Saying "It's acknowledged in the literature" is less effective than "It's acknowledged in recent studies on climate change".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "acknowledged in" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to indicate that a fact, idea, limitation, or contribution has been recognized or admitted within a particular context. As Ludwig AI indicates, it’s grammatically correct and usable in written English. The phrase highlights the recognition of something within a defined boundary, such as a document, discussion, or field of study.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

29%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "acknowledged in" is a versatile and frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates recognition or acceptance within a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and suitable for various writing styles, particularly in news, scientific, and formal settings. While interchangeable with alternatives like "recognized in" or "mentioned in", it's crucial to specify the context to avoid vagueness. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, writers can effectively leverage "acknowledged in" to enhance clarity and credibility.

FAQs

How can I use "acknowledged in" in a sentence?

You can use "acknowledged in" to indicate that something has been recognized or accepted within a specific context. For example, "The limitations of the study were "acknowledged in" the discussion section".

What are some alternatives to "acknowledged in"?

Some alternatives to "acknowledged in" include "recognized in", "mentioned in", or "identified in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to specify where something is acknowledged?

While not always grammatically required, specifying where something is "acknowledged in" adds clarity and credibility to your writing. Vague statements can weaken your argument.

Which is more formal, "acknowledged in" or "recognized in"?

"Acknowledged in" and "recognized in" are generally interchangeable and carry a similar level of formality. The choice often depends on stylistic preference or the specific context.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: