Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
acknowledged in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "acknowledged in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been recognized or accepted within a specific context, such as a document, discussion, or field of study. Example: "The findings of the research were acknowledged in the latest scientific journal."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
"We've never really been acknowledged in America.
News & Media
Their very existence is barely acknowledged in the media.
News & Media
That was acknowledged in testimony by Ms Yellen.
News & Media
As she herself acknowledged, in forgiving him, they were "childish".
News & Media
Other sporting figures were acknowledged in the Australia Day honours.
News & Media
His achievements were acknowledged in varying ways over the years.
News & Media
They wanted the existence of Kurds acknowledged in the constitution.
News & Media
Those who labor backstage are seldom acknowledged in the theater.
News & Media
Rodriguez acknowledged in February that he had used steroids.
News & Media
None of these sources are acknowledged in the essay's footnotes.
News & Media
Not that this was acknowledged in his manifesto.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider stronger synonyms if you intend to convey more than simple recognition. Words like "validated", "confirmed", or "celebrated" might be more appropriate depending on your intended meaning.
Common error
Avoid using "acknowledged in" without specifying where the acknowledgement occurred. Saying "It's acknowledged in the literature" is less effective than "It's acknowledged in recent studies on climate change".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "acknowledged in" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to indicate that a fact, idea, limitation, or contribution has been recognized or admitted within a particular context. As Ludwig AI indicates, it’s grammatically correct and usable in written English. The phrase highlights the recognition of something within a defined boundary, such as a document, discussion, or field of study.
Frequent in
Science
31%
News & Media
29%
Wiki
7%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "acknowledged in" is a versatile and frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates recognition or acceptance within a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and suitable for various writing styles, particularly in news, scientific, and formal settings. While interchangeable with alternatives like "recognized in" or "mentioned in", it's crucial to specify the context to avoid vagueness. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, writers can effectively leverage "acknowledged in" to enhance clarity and credibility.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Recognized within
This alternative focuses on the act of recognition but uses "within" to specify the context, similar to "in".
Identified in
This alternative suggests something was pointed out or discovered within a specific source or context.
Mentioned in
This indicates a brief reference to something within a document or discussion.
Cited within
This alternative is used when referring to something that has been quoted or referred to as an authority.
Contained within
This suggests that the information is included or present within a defined boundary.
Included in
This alternative is more general, indicating that something is part of a larger whole.
Referenced in
This suggests that something is alluded to or indirectly mentioned.
Appreciated within
Implies a positive evaluation and recognition, differing slightly in tone from mere acknowledgment.
Validated by
Highlights that something has been confirmed or supported in a specific context.
Confirmed through
Indicates that something has been verified or corroborated by means of a specific channel or context.
FAQs
How can I use "acknowledged in" in a sentence?
You can use "acknowledged in" to indicate that something has been recognized or accepted within a specific context. For example, "The limitations of the study were "acknowledged in" the discussion section".
What are some alternatives to "acknowledged in"?
Some alternatives to "acknowledged in" include "recognized in", "mentioned in", or "identified in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it always necessary to specify where something is acknowledged?
While not always grammatically required, specifying where something is "acknowledged in" adds clarity and credibility to your writing. Vague statements can weaken your argument.
Which is more formal, "acknowledged in" or "recognized in"?
"Acknowledged in" and "recognized in" are generally interchangeable and carry a similar level of formality. The choice often depends on stylistic preference or the specific context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested