identified in

USAGE SUMMARY

"identified in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been previously pointed out or highlighted. For example, "The benefits of this product were identified in the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

ODAP was identified in 1964.

The New Yorker

9. was identified in Lochaber?

The New York Times

The polio virus was identified in 1840.

Independent

They were not identified in the statement.

The New York Times

All identified in ink, verso.

Yale University

(Patients are not identified in the survey).

The New York Times - Arts

Enormous potential reserves were identified in Australia.

The Guardian

He was not identified in the complaints.

The New York Times

TB was identified in the 1020s.

The Guardian

Further cases have been identified in Jordan.

The Guardian

Infidelity is identified in both instances.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "identified in", ensure that the context clearly indicates where the identification occurred. For example: "The error was identified in the second paragraph."

Common error

Avoid using "identified in" without specifying the source or location. Instead of saying "The problem was identified in", provide context such as "The problem was identified in the user survey."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified in" primarily functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been recognized or pinpointed within a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

38%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "identified in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase across various professional domains. Ludwig AI validates its correctness, confirming its effectiveness in specifying where something has been recognized or discovered. It's particularly common in "News & Media" and "Science", conveying precision and clarity in formal communication. When using this phrase, ensure clear context to avoid vagueness and maximize its impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

discovered in

Focuses on the initial finding or uncovering of something.

recognized within

Stresses the acknowledgment or awareness of something within a particular context.

detected within

Highlights the detection of something, often used in scientific or technical contexts.

ascertained within

Implies a more formal or investigative process of finding something.

located within

Focuses on the physical or conceptual placement rather than the act of identification.

uncovered in

Highlights the revealing or bringing to light of something previously hidden.

found inside

Emphasizes the discovery of something within a specific location or set of data.

determined to be in

Emphasizes the process of establishing the presence or nature of something.

pinpointed within

Suggests a precise and accurate location of something.

traced back to

Focuses on finding the origin or source of something.

FAQs

How can I use "identified in" in a sentence?

Use "identified in" to indicate where something was discovered or recognized. For example, "The key issues were "identified in" the report."

What are some alternatives to using "identified in"?

You can use alternatives like "located within", "found inside", or "detected within" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "identified in" or "discovered in"?

The choice depends on the context. "Identified in" implies a recognition of something already present, while "discovered in" suggests finding something new or previously unknown.

What's the difference between "identified in" and "mentioned in"?

"Identified in" suggests a specific recognition or pinpointing, whereas "mentioned in" simply indicates that something was referred to, possibly in passing.