accused with

USAGE SUMMARY

"accused with" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when one is alleging someone of wrong-doing, and the responsibility for this action is shared with someone else. For example: "The man was accused with his colleague of embezzlement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dr. Acerbi et al. feel (wrongly) accused, with accusations certainly not having been my intention.

Acta Neurochirurgica

But now the accusers are being accused, with a battle being waged over principles of free speech, government overreach and collaboration with activist organizations.

The New York Times - Science

The accusations centered around the alleged involvement of the accused with destabilization plans hatched in the United States.

Huffington Post

James Jones and Claude Fuller were accused with him.

The New York Times

Reviewing Authority's Recommendations: (could not read first part) Accused with other members of the staff beat POWs constantly.

University of California, Berkeley

He was accused with fellow party leaders of scheming to overthrow Obiang.

The Guardian

A second radiologist, accused with Dr. DiBlasio, is awaiting his hearing.

The New York Times

Hill was accused, with two comrades, of killing a policeman in New Mexico in 1971.

The New Yorker

Webber, accused with family members of accepting cash and gifts worth $280,000, did not.

The New York Times - Magazine

Newspapers published the names of the accused with their full addresses and occupations.

The Guardian

The indictment charges the 10 accused with racketeering conspiracy, fraud, money laundering and tax offenses.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "accused with", ensure it's clear who else is involved and what specific actions they are accused of. For example, specify "accused with his brother of fraud" instead of just "accused with fraud".

Common error

Avoid using "accused for" instead of "accused with". "Accused with" indicates co-accused parties, while "accused of" indicates the offense.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "accused with" functions as a passive verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that someone is being jointly accused of something. Ludwig shows that this phrase is typically used to denote shared accusations, often in legal contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

20%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Science

4%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "accused with" is a commonly used phrase to indicate that someone is jointly accused of a crime or wrongdoing alongside others. It's grammatically correct and most frequently found in news and media reporting as well as in academic texts. Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples confirms this usage. To ensure clarity, always specify who is being accused and what the shared accusation entails. Remember that the phrase denotes a joint accusation, differentiating it from being accused of a specific offense. When writing, avoid using "accused for" in place of "accused with" and always verify you're referring to people rather than concepts. The AI confirms the accuracy of this characterization of this construction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

jointly accused of

A more concise and direct way of stating shared accusation.

charged along with

Focuses on the legal aspect of being formally charged, emphasizing joint involvement.

indicted with

Highlights the formal accusation by a grand jury, stressing shared responsibility.

facing charges with

Emphasizes the ongoing legal process and shared burden of the charges.

implicated alongside

Suggests involvement in a crime or wrongdoing, with an emphasis on being linked to others.

associated in the accusation

Emphasizes the connection to the accusation itself, rather than the act.

alleged to be involved with

Highlights the allegation and the implied involvement, emphasizing uncertainty.

suspected of colluding with

Suggests a secret agreement or conspiracy, adding a layer of intrigue.

linked to in the charges

Focuses on the connection established by the charges, emphasizing evidence.

named as a co-conspirator

Specifically refers to a conspiracy and the person's role in it.

FAQs

How do I properly use "accused with" in a sentence?

Use "accused with" to indicate that someone is being jointly accused alongside another person or group of people. For example: "He was "accused with" his accomplices in the robbery."

What's the difference between "accused with" and "accused of"?

"Accused with" indicates who someone is accused alongside, while "accused of" indicates the charge or crime. For example, "He was "accused with" his brother of fraud."

Can I use "accused with" to describe an object or a concept?

No, "accused with" is typically used only in the context of people who are jointly accused. You can't say, for instance, "The company was "accused with" mismanagement." Instead, use phrases like "The company was accused of mismanagement."

What are some alternatives to "accused with" that convey a similar meaning?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "charged along with", "indicted with", or "implicated alongside" to indicate shared responsibility in an accusation.