indicted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'indicted with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to someone who has been formally accused or charged with a crime or offense. For example: "The suspect was recently indicted with embezzlement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sports

Legal

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Snowden has been indicted with a criminal offence".

The Guardian

In 1997, one S.M.M. member, Jose Rodriguez, who had been indicted with Mr. Rollock, was cooperating.

The New York Times

Sir Anthony, indicted with Mr. Taubman, refused to travel from London to stand trial.

The New York Times

Three successive Waterbury mayors have been indicted, with one being convicted of sex crimes with minors.

The New York Times

He had been indicted with his deputy, Franko Simatovic, now also at The Hague.

The New York Times

On July 17, Vick was indicted with Peace, Phillips and Tony Taylor, another former associate.

The New York Times - Sports

Six Baltimore officers have been indicted with charges as severe as murder.

The Guardian

He was indicted with the former chief executive, L. Dennis Kozlowski.

The New York Times

A former officer, Jeff Haywood, was indicted with Corporal De La Paz.

The New York Times

Mr. Dahoumane was indicted with the other three men but not arrested here.

The New York Times

Two of the three men indicted with Vick are expected to plead guilty in the case later this week.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "indicted with", ensure that it's followed by the specific crime or charges the person is accused of to provide clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "indicted with" when the person has already been found guilty. "Indicted" refers to the formal accusation, while "convicted" means they have been proven guilty in court. Use "convicted of" to indicate guilt, and "indicted with" to indicate the formal accusation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "indicted with" functions as a passive verb construction in legal contexts. It indicates that a person has been formally accused of a crime alongside others. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this is a correct and usable phrase in English. It highlights the joint nature of the accusation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Wiki

6%

Science

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "indicted with" is a correct and commonly used expression to indicate that someone has been formally accused of a crime, often alongside other individuals. According to Ludwig AI, it is a valid and appropriate phrase for conveying legal accusations. The analysis shows that it primarily appears in news and media contexts, maintaining a neutral register. When using this phrase, clarity is key; ensure you specify the charges and context of the indictment. While "indicted for" is also correct, "indicted with" emphasizes the joint aspect of the accusation. Remember not to confuse it with "convicted of", which denotes guilt rather than accusation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

charged alongside

Focuses on the legal charging process, highlighting the shared accusation.

accused in conjunction with

Emphasizes the joint nature of the accusation and the cooperative aspect of the crime.

jointly accused of

Highlights the shared aspect of the accusation and legal action.

co-indicted for

Specifically refers to a joint indictment for a particular offense.

facing charges with

Focuses on the current state of facing legal charges together.

formally accused with others of

Emphasizes the formal aspect of the accusation and the joint liability.

implicated together in

Suggests involvement in a crime as a group.

named as co-defendants in

Highlights their roles as defendants in a shared legal case.

prosecuted jointly for

Focuses on the legal prosecution of the group.

charged in connection with

Suggests that the charges are related to a specific event or case.

FAQs

How is "indicted with" used in a sentence?

The phrase "indicted with" is used to indicate that someone has been formally charged with a crime, often alongside other individuals. For example, "He was "indicted with" fraud and conspiracy."

What's the difference between "indicted with" and "charged with"?

While both phrases relate to legal accusations, "charged with" is a more general term, while "indicted with" specifies that the charges were brought forth by a grand jury. You can also be "charged with" a crime without being formally indicted.

What can I say instead of "indicted with"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "accused alongside", "jointly accused of", or "facing charges with".

Is it correct to say "indicted for" instead of "indicted with"?

While "indicted for" is also correct, "indicted with" is often used when multiple people are charged together, highlighting their shared legal situation. "Indicted for" focuses more on the specific crime, while "indicted with" can emphasize the group aspect.