acceptable to exclude

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "acceptable to exclude" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether it is permissible or appropriate to leave something out of a particular context or situation. Example: "In this report, it is acceptable to exclude any data that is not relevant to the main findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Why or why not? –Is it acceptable to exclude people from serving on juries for having other opinions?

The New York Times

In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, David Cameron's three most senior lieutenants said "the question now is whether it is any longer acceptable to exclude people from marriage simply because they love someone of the same sex".

The Guardian

The three ministers — George Osborne, the chancellor of the Exchequer; Foreign Secretary William Hague; and Home Secretary Theresa May — also asked whether it was "any longer acceptable to exclude people from marriage simply because they love someone of the same sex".

The New York Times

If it does, it would be asking the 9th Court not only to rule that it is acceptable to exclude gay citizens from jury service, but also to make it more difficult to challenge anti-gay laws.

Huffington Post

When ineligible patients are mistakenly randomised into a trial it is acceptable to exclude participants' data within an intention to treat approach without risking bias.

British Medical Journal

If it is tolerable to limited the participation of elderly patients, for their frailty, comorbidities or different metabolism, in the inclusion of phase I or dose finding and Phase II trials it is not acceptable to exclude them in the large phase III.

BMC Geriatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

It is therefore acceptable, he argued, to exclude same-sex couples.

The New York Times

In a policy statement issued Monday, the American Academy of Pediatrics also said that if parents continue to refuse vaccinations despite exhaustive efforts to change their minds, it would be "acceptable" for doctors to exclude these..

Los Angeles Times

This overbreadth is most stark in the General Assembly's decision to exclude as acceptable identification all forms of state-issued ID disproportionately held by African Americans.

Huffington Post

Consider, for example, the potential for political pressure to exclude tobacco companies from acceptable investments, or nonunion companies, or companies involved in some kind of wrongdoing.

The New York Times

He first insisted that because Trump had modified his proposed ban to exclude U.S. citizens, it was now acceptable.

HuffPost

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "acceptable to exclude", ensure the criteria for acceptability are clearly defined. For instance, specify what standards or guidelines determine whether something can be excluded.

Common error

Avoid assuming universal agreement on what is "acceptable to exclude". Always provide context and justification, as acceptability often depends on specific circumstances and perspectives.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "acceptable to exclude" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying an implied noun, indicating that a certain action or omission is permissible or allowable. Ludwig AI confirms its usage in various contexts, showcasing its role in expressing approval or justification of exclusion.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

40%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "acceptable to exclude" is a grammatically sound expression used to convey that something is permissible to leave out or omit. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that its use, while not overly frequent, is consistent across a range of reputable sources, particularly in news, scientific, and academic domains. When employing this phrase, clarity in defining the criteria for acceptability is key. Alternatives like ""permissible to omit"" or ""allowable to leave out"" may offer subtle shifts in emphasis, depending on the intended context. It's vital to avoid overgeneralizations and provide adequate justification for any exclusions to ensure clarity and avoid potential misunderstandings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

permissible to omit

Replaces "acceptable" with "permissible" and "exclude" with "omit", focusing on the permissibility of leaving something out.

allowable to leave out

Uses "allowable" instead of "acceptable" and "leave out" instead of "exclude", emphasizing the allowance of omitting something.

appropriate to omit

Substitutes "acceptable" with "appropriate", highlighting the suitability of omitting something.

suitable to exclude

Replaces "acceptable" with "suitable", focusing on the fitness of excluding something.

reasonable to exclude

Uses "reasonable" instead of "acceptable", emphasizing the rationality of excluding something.

justifiable to exclude

Substitutes "acceptable" with "justifiable", suggesting the exclusion is defensible.

legitimate to omit

Replaces "acceptable to exclude" with "legitimate to omit", suggesting that the omission is lawful or valid.

valid to exclude

Substitutes "acceptable" with "valid", implying that the exclusion is well-founded.

warranted to exclude

Replaces "acceptable" with "warranted", suggesting the exclusion is justified by circumstances.

in order to exclude

Changes the phrasing to focus on the purpose of excluding something, rather than its acceptability.

FAQs

What does "acceptable to exclude" mean?

The phrase "acceptable to exclude" means that it is permissible or allowable to leave something out or omit it. The acceptability depends on the context and any relevant rules or guidelines.

When is it "acceptable to exclude" data in a research study?

It is generally "acceptable to exclude" data in a research study when it is irrelevant, unreliable, or introduces bias. However, these exclusions should always be documented and justified.

What are some alternatives to "acceptable to exclude"?

Alternatives include "permissible to omit", "allowable to leave out", or "appropriate to omit", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always "acceptable to exclude" certain information?

No, it is not always "acceptable to exclude" certain information. The decision to exclude information should be based on clear criteria and ethical considerations. Excluding relevant information could be misleading or unethical.