Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
allowable to leave out
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "allowable to leave out" is not correct in standard written English.
A more appropriate expression would be "allowed to leave out." Example: "In this assignment, you are allowed to leave out any sections that are not relevant to your argument."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Wiki
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Not to leave out John Travolta.
News & Media
But which to leave out?
News & Media
But who to leave out?
News & Media
And what to leave out.
News & Media
Remember to leave out the :1.
Wiki
Start to leave out extra kitten food.
Wiki
Know which information to leave out.
Wiki
It is allowable to leave the 'bkgfile' parameter value blank, which results in no background spectra or responses being created.
Academia
That is, in leave-one-out crossvalidation, one sample is selected to left out.
Science
Leave out to dry overnight.
Wiki
Leave out to cool for a while.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When intending to convey permission or possibility of omission, use the phrase "allowed to leave out" or a similar grammatically correct alternative such as "permitted to omit".
Common error
Avoid using "allowable" when you mean "allowed". "Allowable" describes something that is permissible under a set of rules or guidelines, while "allowed" indicates that permission has been granted. For example, say "you are allowed to leave out irrelevant sections", not "you are allowable to leave out irrelevant sections".
Source & Trust
72%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "allowable to leave out" is an infinitive phrase that attempts to express permission or possibility regarding omission. However, it is grammatically incorrect; the correct form would involve using "allowed" instead of "allowable". As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is not standard in written English.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "allowable to leave out" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests that the correct alternative is "allowed to leave out". The word "allowable" describes something that is permissible under certain rules. Due to its incorrect usage, there are no real-world examples of the phrase. Therefore, it is essential to use grammatically sound alternatives such as "permitted to omit" or acceptable to exclude to effectively convey your intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
can leave out
A more straightforward and grammatically sound alternative to the original phrase.
allowed to omit
Replaces "leave out" with "omit" which is more formal, and "allowable" with "allowed" making it grammatically correct.
permitted to exclude
Substitutes "allowable" with "permitted" and "leave out" with "exclude" resulting in a grammatically correct and more formal tone.
acceptable to exclude
Uses "acceptable" instead of "allowable" and "exclude" instead of "leave out", conveying a sense of what is considered suitable or satisfactory.
able to exclude
Uses "able" instead of "allowable"; still expresses the possibility of excluding something.
may exclude
A simpler and more direct way of saying that something can be excluded.
optional to include
Shifts the focus to inclusion rather than exclusion, suggesting that something does not need to be included.
not required to add
Emphasizes that adding something is not a necessity, shifting the focus from permission to requirement.
at liberty to skip
Suggests freedom or discretion in omitting something, making it a more polite alternative.
free to disregard
Implies that something can be ignored or not taken into account, offering a more assertive alternative.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say that something can be left out?
Instead of "allowable to leave out", use "allowed to omit" or "permitted to exclude". These alternatives are grammatically correct and convey the intended meaning clearly.
What does 'allowable' really mean?
The word "allowable" describes something that is permissible according to a set of rules or standards. For example, "the allowable deductions" on a tax return are those that the tax law permits. Avoid using "allowable" when you mean "allowed", which means that permission has been given.
How can I rephrase 'allowable to leave out' to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider using "acceptable to exclude" or ""permitted to omit"". These phrases provide a more sophisticated and precise way to express the idea of something being able to be left out.
What's the difference between 'allowable' and 'allowed'?
"Allowable" refers to what is permitted or permissible under certain rules or standards. "Allowed" means that permission has been granted. Using "allowable to leave out" is incorrect; the correct phrasing is "allowed to omit".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
72%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested