a robust hypothesis

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a robust hypothesis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a well-supported or strong hypothesis in scientific or academic contexts. Example: "The researchers presented a robust hypothesis that explained the observed phenomena in their study."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

A robust hypothesis was considered critical while non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies were also considered valuable.

European Journal of Cancer

A robust hypothesis for the origin of genetic code should also address or predict the following gross features of the codon table: absence of codons for D-amino acids secondary codon patterns for some amino acids confinement of synonymous positions to third position limitation to 20 amino acids instead of a number closer to 64 relation of stop codon patterns to amino acid coding patterns.

Wikipedia

Inferences regarding the evolution of the rattlesnake style necessarily require a robust hypothesis of rattlesnake relationships.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

However, the 95% HPD intervals for the relevant nodes overlap largely, and we lack a robust hypothesis about dating of splits in the species tree.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Here, we revisit the selection of single-copy orthologs from completely sequenced genomes for Wolbachia phylogenomics, and use an extended gene data set to develop a robust hypothesis of Wolbachia relationships.

Genome Biology and Evolution

In infraorder Pentatomomorpha, phylogenetic analyses based on nucleotide sequences favor the monophyly of each superfamily (the monophyly of Aradoidea has been generally accepted though it has not been analyzed in this study) and raise a robust hypothesis of (Aradoidea + (Pentatomoidea + (Pyrrhocoroidea + (Lygaeoidea + Coreoidea)))).

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

By this approach, the meta-classifier is able to provide a more robust hypothesis, which is minimally biased by a specific choice of false instances.

Bioinformatics

In this paper we investigate if DNA sequence data can be used to produce a more robust hypothesis of charadriiform relationships.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

In this study we used mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences to develop a robust phylogenetic hypothesis for Astyanax and Bramocharax.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Here we present a robust phylogenetic hypothesis and divergence time estimates for the birds-of-paradise (stricto sensu), based on both nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Such a robust phylogenetic hypothesis has been long-needed as the framework for evolutionary comparative studies within this highly diversified metazoan phylum.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting a "robust hypothesis", ensure you clearly articulate the underlying assumptions and the evidence supporting it. This builds credibility and allows for a more thorough evaluation.

Common error

Avoid claiming a hypothesis is "robust" without providing sufficient justification or acknowledging potential limitations. Overconfidence can undermine the credibility of your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a robust hypothesis" functions as a noun phrase, where "robust" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "hypothesis". It describes a particular quality of the hypothesis. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

85%

Wiki

15%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a robust hypothesis" is used to describe a hypothesis that is strong, well-supported, and reliable. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and appropriate for formal and scientific contexts. While alternatives like "a strong hypothesis" or "a well-supported hypothesis" exist, the choice depends on the specific emphasis desired. In academic writing, it's crucial to provide sufficient evidence to justify the claim that a hypothesis is indeed "robust", avoiding overstatement and ensuring credibility. While its frequency is uncommon, its usage adds weight to scientific discussions and research presentations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a well-supported hypothesis

Focuses on the evidence supporting the hypothesis.

a strong hypothesis

Emphasizes the strength and validity of the hypothesis.

a solid hypothesis

Highlights the firmness and reliability of the hypothesis.

a compelling hypothesis

Indicates the hypothesis is convincing and persuasive.

a credible hypothesis

Stresses the believability and trustworthiness of the hypothesis.

a defensible hypothesis

Suggests the hypothesis can be justified and defended against criticism.

a sound hypothesis

Emphasizes the logical coherence and validity of the hypothesis.

a testable hypothesis

Focuses on the ability to test and verify the hypothesis.

an evidence-based hypothesis

Highlights that the hypothesis is based on solid evidence.

a substantiated hypothesis

Indicates the hypothesis is supported by considerable evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "a robust hypothesis" in a sentence?

You can use "a robust hypothesis" to describe a theory that is well-supported by evidence and logical reasoning. For example: "The research team developed a "robust hypothesis" to explain the observed phenomenon.".

What are some alternatives to saying "a robust hypothesis"?

Alternatives include "a well-supported hypothesis", "a strong hypothesis", or "a solid hypothesis". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

What makes a hypothesis "robust"?

A hypothesis is considered "robust" when it is supported by a significant body of evidence, has withstood rigorous testing, and can account for a wide range of observations. It should also be resistant to minor variations in the data or assumptions.

Is there a difference between "a robust hypothesis" and "a testable hypothesis"?

Yes, while both are important, they emphasize different aspects. "A testable hypothesis" focuses on whether the hypothesis can be subjected to empirical testing, while "a robust hypothesis" implies that the hypothesis has already been tested and has consistently yielded supporting evidence.