Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a reviewed version
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a reviewed version" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a document or text that has been examined and possibly edited for accuracy or quality. Example: "Please submit a reviewed version of your report by the end of the week."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
The patients' comments were taken into consideration by the expert panel and integrated when drafting a reviewed version of the questionnaire.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
As part of the ongoing development of the ICF conceptual model, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2) was created in 1998 (as a substantially reviewed version of the WHO-DAS[ 8]) to assess disability based on the ICF model[ 9].
A backward translation of the reviewed version was then translated into Dutch, to verify that the meaning of each item of the scale was preserved.
We indexed every DER file based on a file name convention that consisted of the pesticide chemical (PC) code, study identification number (MRID), study type identification number [based on 870 series OPPTS harmonized health effect guidelines (U.S. EPA 1996)], species code, review identification number (TXR), and a review version code.
He offered his views in a lecture on "Value Theory and Ethics" in 1924/25 and then again in a reviewed and expanded version in 1926/27.
Science
"There is not a scientific reason to lump those two together," Dr. John R. Balmes, a professor of environmental health and medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who reviewed a version of the report before it was published, said in a recent interview.
News & Media
"It's... practically guaranteed to put a smile on the face of all but the most determined grouch," Lawrence Van Gelder said in The New York Times when he reviewed a version of the show at New York Theater Workshop in 1998.
News & Media
We would thus be willing to review a revised version that met the following criteria: 1) Analysis at full resolution.
Science
Here we review a version of each type of argument.
Science
These conditions would make it more difficult for parents to care for sick children, said Dr. Steven J. Goldstein, a New York-based pediatrician who reviewed a redacted version of Michael's medical records.
News & Media
All authors approved the final review version.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "a reviewed version", ensure the context clearly indicates who performed the review and what criteria were used.
Common error
Avoid using "a reviewed version" if the material has only undergone a superficial check. Reserve it for situations where a thorough examination has taken place.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a reviewed version" functions as a noun phrase, where "reviewed" acts as an adjective modifying "version". It describes a particular state of a document or text that has undergone scrutiny and possible revision.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
41%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "a reviewed version" is a phrase used to describe a document or text that has been examined and potentially revised. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and mostly used in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, make sure the context clearly indicates who performed the review and what criteria were used. Alternative phrases include "an edited draft" or "a revised edition". The phrase has a neutral to formal register, appropriate for professional, academic, and news-related communications.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
an edited draft
Emphasizes the editing process, suggesting corrections and improvements were made.
a revised edition
Suggests a more formal or substantial change, often used for published materials.
a checked copy
Highlights the verification aspect, indicating that the copy has been examined for errors.
a proofread document
Focuses on the correction of typographical errors and inconsistencies.
an inspected variant
Implies a detailed examination to ensure compliance with standards.
a vetted manuscript
Suggests a thorough evaluation, often for sensitive or confidential information.
a finalized text
Emphasizes the completion of the review process, indicating readiness for publication or use.
a polished form
Highlights the improvement of quality through careful attention to detail.
a refined model
Implies subtle adjustments and improvements to enhance performance or appearance.
a validated assessment
Indicates the confirmation of accuracy and reliability through rigorous testing.
FAQs
How can I use "a reviewed version" in a sentence?
You can use "a reviewed version" to indicate that a document or piece of work has been examined and revised, for example, "Please submit "a reviewed version" of your manuscript by Friday".
What are some alternatives to "a reviewed version"?
Alternatives include "an edited draft", "a revised edition", or "a proofread document" depending on the specific context.
Is there a difference between "a reviewed version" and "a revised version"?
"A reviewed version" implies that the document has been examined and corrected, while "a revised version" suggests that more significant changes and improvements have been made.
When is it appropriate to use "a reviewed version"?
It's appropriate when you want to emphasize that a document has been examined and corrected, but not necessarily completely rewritten. The process confirms its validity and improves readability.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested