Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

a reviewed version

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a reviewed version" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a document or text that has been examined and possibly edited for accuracy or quality. Example: "Please submit a reviewed version of your report by the end of the week."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The patients' comments were taken into consideration by the expert panel and integrated when drafting a reviewed version of the questionnaire.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

As part of the ongoing development of the ICF conceptual model, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2) was created in 1998 (as a substantially reviewed version of the WHO-DAS[ 8]) to assess disability based on the ICF model[ 9].

A backward translation of the reviewed version was then translated into Dutch, to verify that the meaning of each item of the scale was preserved.

We indexed every DER file based on a file name convention that consisted of the pesticide chemical (PC) code, study identification number (MRID), study type identification number [based on 870 series OPPTS harmonized health effect guidelines (U.S. EPA 1996)], species code, review identification number (TXR), and a review version code.

He offered his views in a lecture on "Value Theory and Ethics" in 1924/25 and then again in a reviewed and expanded version in 1926/27.

Science

SEP

"There is not a scientific reason to lump those two together," Dr. John R. Balmes, a professor of environmental health and medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, who reviewed a version of the report before it was published, said in a recent interview.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It's... practically guaranteed to put a smile on the face of all but the most determined grouch," Lawrence Van Gelder said in The New York Times when he reviewed a version of the show at New York Theater Workshop in 1998.

We would thus be willing to review a revised version that met the following criteria: 1) Analysis at full resolution.

Science

eLife

Here we review a version of each type of argument.

Science

SEP

These conditions would make it more difficult for parents to care for sick children, said Dr. Steven J. Goldstein, a New York-based pediatrician who reviewed a redacted version of Michael's medical records.

News & Media

Huffington Post

All authors approved the final review version.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a reviewed version", ensure the context clearly indicates who performed the review and what criteria were used.

Common error

Avoid using "a reviewed version" if the material has only undergone a superficial check. Reserve it for situations where a thorough examination has taken place.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a reviewed version" functions as a noun phrase, where "reviewed" acts as an adjective modifying "version". It describes a particular state of a document or text that has undergone scrutiny and possible revision.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a reviewed version" is a phrase used to describe a document or text that has been examined and potentially revised. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and mostly used in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, make sure the context clearly indicates who performed the review and what criteria were used. Alternative phrases include "an edited draft" or "a revised edition". The phrase has a neutral to formal register, appropriate for professional, academic, and news-related communications.

FAQs

How can I use "a reviewed version" in a sentence?

You can use "a reviewed version" to indicate that a document or piece of work has been examined and revised, for example, "Please submit "a reviewed version" of your manuscript by Friday".

What are some alternatives to "a reviewed version"?

Alternatives include "an edited draft", "a revised edition", or "a proofread document" depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "a reviewed version" and "a revised version"?

"A reviewed version" implies that the document has been examined and corrected, while "a revised version" suggests that more significant changes and improvements have been made.

When is it appropriate to use "a reviewed version"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize that a document has been examined and corrected, but not necessarily completely rewritten. The process confirms its validity and improves readability.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: