Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig. Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
Login and get your AI feedback from Ludwig.
Participants based their preference for a one-time consent on the perceived expertise of the researchers, and on their expectation that researchers would act in their best interest.
Many cancer patients surveyed preferred a one-time consent although others desired some form of control.
Though a one-time consent would undoubtedly simplify the research process, blanket consents cannot be considered true consent.
Our results clearly showed that of the three options provided (re-consent, one-time consent, and tiered consent), the majority of patients (59.6%) preferred a one-time consent.
All participants favoured a one-time consent process, although two broad sets of perspectives emerged when it came to the details of how far this process could go.
The slightly higher preference for a one-time consent by patients as compared to those in the general public may be due to their personal interest in the research and the high degree of trust in their medical team.
In total, these results are similar to findings from our study and indicate that while the majority of participants are comfortable with a one-time consent, many prefer tiered consent or re-consent approaches indicating a desire for control.
Awesome tool! I started using it one year ago and I never had to look for another app
Ha Thuy Vy
MA of Applied Linguistic, Maquarie University, Australia