a lack of comprehensiveness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a lack of comprehensiveness" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something is not thorough or complete in its coverage or detail. Example: "The report received criticism for a lack of comprehensiveness, failing to address several key issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Ceasefires and political agreements between only the two main factions have failed to take hold for a lack of comprehensiveness and wider buy-in from all those involved in the war.

The Guardian - Opinion

Some of the limitations associated with the IASB rules include a lack of comprehensiveness, insufficient development of interpretive guidelines, and a lack of any infrastructure for ensuring the enforcement of the new standards.

Britannica

New instructors tend to rely on "extensive, painstaking preparation with a focus on understanding and covering everything--especially on avoiding criticism about a lack of comprehensiveness" (p. 13).

Science Magazine

One interviewee claimed that, although health is a multidisciplinary issue, the lack of attention to multidisciplinary perspectives results in a lack of comprehensiveness in identifying needs and needs assessment.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

However, there is a lack of consistency and comprehensiveness in return-to-work measurements [ 5].

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

However, evidence on the criterion validity of the most recent PASBAQ is limited, mainly because of a lack of generalizability and comprehensiveness of previous findings.

American Journal of Epidemiology

Such indicators might be reflective of additional comorbidities and/or lack of affiliation with a family physician resulting in a lack of continuity and comprehensiveness of care [ 29].

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

As posited by some [ 12, 13], it may be that shorter questionnaires convey a lack of importance and comprehensiveness required for them to be perceived as in need of completion relative to longer versions.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The complexity of a PRO or the lack of comprehensiveness can have an influence on response rate, the proportion of items missing, and the proportion of items requiring manual validation.

Acta Orthopaedica

As indicated in the introduction, the "profile" structure was proposed in order to overcome the lack of comprehensiveness of a single index number.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The review concluded the book was a good deal compared to other cookbooks on the subject, while noting its lack of comprehensiveness with the small number of total recipes included.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When criticizing a report or analysis for “a lack of comprehensiveness”, specify the areas or aspects that were inadequately addressed to strengthen your critique.

Common error

While "a lack of comprehensiveness" is grammatically correct, overuse in formal writing can make your language sound repetitive. Vary your phrasing by using synonyms like "insufficient detail" or "incomplete coverage" to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a lack of comprehensiveness" functions as a noun phrase. It typically acts as a subject, object, or complement within a sentence, describing a deficiency or absence of thoroughness and completeness. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Encyclopedias

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a lack of comprehensiveness" is a grammatically correct noun phrase used to indicate that something is missing thoroughness or completeness. While Ludwig AI confirms its validity, it's worth noting that it is considered an uncommon expression. Its usage spans across science, news media and encyclopedias. For increased impact in your writing, consider replacing it with phrases like "insufficient thoroughness" or "incomplete coverage", and always specify what areas lack comprehensiveness to strengthen your critique.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

insufficient thoroughness

Replaces "lack of comprehensiveness" with synonyms to indicate a deficiency in detail and completeness.

incomplete coverage

Focuses on the aspect of coverage being deficient rather than overall comprehensiveness.

limited scope

Highlights the restricted range or extent of something, similar to lacking comprehensiveness.

want of completeness

A more formal and less common way of expressing the absence of completeness.

absence of thoroughness

Emphasizes the absence of a detailed and careful approach.

superficial treatment

Indicates that something is dealt with in a shallow or cursory manner, lacking depth.

sketchy overview

Suggests that the information provided is incomplete and lacks detail.

inadequate detailing

Points out the deficiency in providing sufficient details.

fragmentary presentation

Indicates that the information is presented in disconnected pieces, lacking a cohesive whole.

cursory examination

Highlights that the examination or review was hasty and not thorough.

FAQs

How can I use "a lack of comprehensiveness" in a sentence?

You can use "a lack of comprehensiveness" to describe a deficiency in the scope or depth of something. For example: "The study was criticized for "a lack of comprehensiveness" in its data collection methods."

What can I say instead of "a lack of comprehensiveness"?

You can use alternatives like "insufficient detail", "incomplete coverage", or "limited scope" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "lack of comprehensiveness" or "a lack of comprehensiveness"?

Both "lack of comprehensiveness" and "a lack of comprehensiveness" are grammatically correct. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. "A lack of comprehensiveness" often implies a specific instance or aspect, while "lack of comprehensiveness" can refer to a general characteristic.

What's the difference between "a lack of comprehensiveness" and "a lack of depth"?

"A lack of comprehensiveness" refers to the breadth or scope of coverage, whereas "a lack of depth" refers to the level of detail or thoroughness in the analysis. Something can be comprehensive but still lack depth, and vice versa.