Was excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was excluded" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to indicate that someone or something was intentionally left out or not included in a group or activity. Example: "She was excluded from the meeting due to her absence." Alternative expressions include "was left out" and "was omitted."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was excluded.

The New Yorker

The public was excluded.

The New Yorker

Another defendant, Liggett, was excluded.

The New York Times

Pure fruit juice was excluded.

Independent

Some of our evidence was excluded.

The New York Times

The female half of society was excluded.

The Guardian

I was stunned that he was excluded".

The New York Times

She was excluded from preseason practice.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr Treshman was excluded in 1993.

The Guardian

The study was excluded.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

adverse events was excluded.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was excluded", ensure the reason for exclusion is clear to maintain transparency and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was excluded" without specifying the criteria. Always provide context on why something or someone was excluded to prevent misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was excluded" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that the subject of the sentence underwent the action of being excluded by someone or something else. As confirmed by Ludwig, this construction is grammatically sound and frequently employed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was excluded" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase to denote intentional omission. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans across various contexts, including scientific, news, and formal domains. While generally neutral in register, it leans towards formality, particularly in professional settings. Remembering to provide clear context for exclusion criteria is vital to avoid misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Was omitted

This suggests a formal removal or oversight in inclusion.

Was not included

This is a direct and neutral way of stating exclusion.

Was left out

This implies a more casual or unintentional exclusion.

Was precluded

This indicates that something was prevented from happening or being included.

Was removed

This indicates a physical or procedural removal.

Was eliminated

This suggests a forceful removal or exclusion.

Was prevented

This suggests that something was stopped from being included.

Was rejected

This implies a conscious decision to not accept something.

Was disregarded

This means something was ignored or not taken into consideration.

Was bypassed

This suggests going around or avoiding something.

FAQs

How can I use "was excluded" in a sentence?

You can use "was excluded" to indicate that something or someone was intentionally left out. For example, "She was excluded from the meeting due to her absence".

What are some alternatives to "was excluded"?

Alternatives include "was omitted", "was left out", or "was not included", depending on the context.

What's the difference between "was excluded" and "was included"?

"Was excluded" means something was deliberately left out, while "was included" means it was deliberately added or considered.

Is it better to use "was excluded" or "was rejected"?

The choice depends on the context. "Was excluded" suggests being left out, while "was rejected" implies a deliberate refusal or non-acceptance.