I was edited

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was edited" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something has undergone changes or modifications, typically in the context of written work or media. Example: "After submitting my article, I was edited by the editorial team to improve clarity and flow."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The 1616 edition of The Political Works of James I was edited by Charles Howard McIlwain (1918).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

I was editing in the camera.

The New Yorker

I was editing A City of Sadness when Tiananmen Square happened.

The Guardian - Film

"I was editing word by word by word and noticing more of the details".

The New York Times - Books

"In 1961 David Frost was editing Granta – then a magazine – and I was editing Oxford Opinion," he wrote.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

In 1961 David Frost was editing Granta – then a magazine – and I was editing Oxford Opinion, which had equally grand ambitions.

The Guardian

"At some points when I was editing I was thinking of them as dramatic figures rather than people.

The Guardian

"When he called me, I was editing my movie, The Eagle Path," Van Damme explains.

The Guardian - Film

Once the publisher of a magazine I was editing took me out to lunch.

The Guardian - Opinion

"I first encountered George's work in the 1980s, when I was editing the Pencilwise section at Games magazine.

The New York Times

In 1993, when I was editing the Guardian's features and comment pages, I asked Georgina to be my deputy.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I was edited", clarify by whom or for what purpose the editing was done to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example, "I was edited by the journal's editorial board for clarity and conciseness."

Common error

Avoid using "I was edited" without specifying who performed the editing. This can leave the reader wondering who did the editing and why. Instead, specify the editor or the entity responsible for the changes to provide clarity and context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was edited" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject ("I") received the action of editing. This construction emphasizes the action performed on the subject rather than the actor. As Ludwig AI shows, it's used in various contexts to convey that one's work or self has been reviewed and modified.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Encyclopedias

6%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Science

1%

Academia

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "I was edited" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction to indicate that the subject has undergone a process of review and modification. As Ludwig AI shows, it is most commonly found in News & Media contexts. To ensure clarity, specify the agent of editing. While generally neutral, context dictates formality. Alternatives such as "I was revised" or "I underwent editing" can provide nuanced meanings depending on the specific intention.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I underwent editing

Replaces "was edited" with "underwent editing", emphasizing the process from the subject's perspective.

My work was revised

Substitutes "edited" with "revised", highlighting the improvement aspect of editing.

The piece was corrected

Replaces "edited" with "corrected", focusing on the removal of errors.

It was subject to editing

Emphasizes the action of being subjected to the editing process.

Changes were made to my draft

Focuses on the changes themselves rather than the act of editing.

My text was modified

Uses "modified" as a more general term for altering the text.

The content was refined

Highlights the enhancement and improvement aspect of editing.

I received editorial feedback

Shifts the focus to the feedback received as part of the editing process.

My document was reviewed

Focuses on the review aspect, implying a comprehensive assessment.

The manuscript was proofread

Highlights the aspect of error checking and final polishing.

FAQs

How can I use "I was edited" in a sentence?

You can use "I was edited" to describe that your work has been reviewed and modified, for example: "After submitting my article, "I was edited" by the editorial team to improve clarity and flow."

What can I say instead of "I was edited"?

You can use alternatives like "I was revised", "I was modified", or "I underwent editing" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "I was edited" or "I was revised"?

Both ""I was edited"" and "I was revised" are correct, but "revised" often implies improvements were made, while "edited" can simply mean changes were made, without necessarily implying improvement.

What does "I was edited" imply about my original work?

""I was edited"" suggests that your original work was reviewed and modified to improve clarity, accuracy, or style. It doesn't necessarily mean your original work was flawed, but that it benefited from refinement.