I was characterised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was characterised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how someone or something has been defined or depicted by others, often in a specific context or situation. Example: "In the report, I was characterised as a leader who inspires innovation and teamwork."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Namely, the polymerization state of monomer i was characterised by two pointers ileft and iright defined as follows: if the left bond of monomer i was unsaturated, we put ileft = 0; if the monomer i was left-bound to monomer j, then ileft = j; the same rules were used for the right pointer iright.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Cluster I was characterised by relatively high ESR1 expression, variable HER2 and ALCAM expression, and weak or negative SPP1 expression.

British Journal of Cancer

Each case i was characterised by a predictor value X i and a criterion value Y i, such that X and Y approximated a bivariate standard normal distribution in the sample.

British Journal of Psychiatry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Each substructure E i is characterised by a measure μ(E i ).

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Humans that have a haploinsufficiency for the gene encoding TFII-I are characterised by a craniofacial phenotype along with cognitive deficits (Pober, 2010).

British Journal of Cancer

Here's the heart of it: "I'm characterised as pro-market.

The Guardian - Opinion

The phase transients of II→I are characterised by an exponential decay of the current without the current maximum (the adsorption process took place only).

Electrochimica Acta

Considering enhancement indexes for NSIDIFF and NSINORM.DIFF, MCs I were characterised by positive values, while MCs II presented mostly negative values for NSINORM.DIFF (7 of 34 for SV and for OV were higher than zero) and were more scattered for NSIDIFF (9 ROIs report values higher than zero in SV, 14 for OV).

European Radiology Experimental

The D-form of complex I is characterised by the exposure of Cys-39 of the ND3 subunit.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects

Anti-resorption agents are considered in the rebuilding of the bone remodelling balance because postmenopausal osteoporosis (type I) is characterised by bone resorption that exceeds bone formation.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

At home, despite the many homeless people of New York, there is an unmistakeable lack of aggressive begging (which I'm characterising as outright approaching rather than sitting on the sidewalk with a sign).

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "I was characterised" to indicate how you were perceived or described by others, particularly in formal or analytical contexts.

Common error

Avoid confusing the passive voice ("I was characterised") with the active voice ("I characterised"). The passive voice emphasizes the characterization done to you, while the active voice implies you did the characterising.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was characterised" functions as a statement in the passive voice, indicating how the speaker was described or defined by someone or something else. Ludwig confirms this usage with various examples from academic, news, and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I was characterised" is a grammatically correct and usable passive voice construction, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is typically employed in neutral to formal registers across domains like science, news, and business. The phrase indicates how the speaker was described or perceived by an external source. While not exceedingly common, its precise usage makes it invaluable for conveying objectivity and analytical distance. Consider alternatives like "I was described" or "I was portrayed" based on the specific nuance required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

I was described

Replaces "characterised" with "described", focusing on a general account.

I was portrayed

Emphasizes the way someone or something was depicted, often artistically or figuratively.

I was represented

Focuses on how someone or something was presented, particularly in a formal or official context.

I was depicted

Highlights the visual or descriptive representation of someone or something.

I was labeled

Indicates the assignment of a specific label or category to someone or something.

I was defined

Stresses the precise meaning or scope attributed to someone or something.

I was considered

Emphasizes the act of being regarded or thought of in a particular way.

I was regarded

Highlights how someone or something was viewed or esteemed.

I was seen as

Focuses on the perception of someone or something by others.

I was known as

Indicates a common or recognized identity or reputation.

FAQs

How can I use "I was characterised" in a sentence?

Use "I was characterised" to describe how someone or something has been defined or portrayed by others. For example, "In the report, "I was characterised" as a leader who inspires innovation and teamwork."

What are some alternatives to "I was characterised"?

Alternatives include phrases like "I was described", "I was portrayed", or "I was represented", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "I was characterised" or "I characterised"?

The choice depends on the meaning you intend. ""I was characterised"" means someone else described you, while "I characterised" means you provided the description.

What's the difference between "I was characterised as" and "I was defined as"?

"I was characterised as" suggests a general depiction or portrayal, while "I was defined as" indicates a more precise or formal definition.