Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

I was described

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "I was described" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to how someone has characterized or portrayed you in the past. Example: "In the meeting, I was described as a key contributor to the project, which made me feel appreciated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

Twice I was described as "funny looking".

The year I was described in a review – a right royal slagging – as a "skinny Dido".

News & Media

The Guardian

Last summer I was described by some as Jeremy Corbyn's economic guru.

Back in 2007 in a Guardian supplement I was described as "the sourdough genius Mick Hartley".

Two weeks ago, I was described in the Mail's diary column as "overtly gay".

News & Media

The Guardian

I was described by Joanna Blythman in Sunday's Observer as "floundering" for standing by our existing advice.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Lemma 4.5 Let u i be described in Theorem  4.3.

The ith amino acid, n i, is described by a vector (x1,…, x m, y i ).

The EGFP transgene cassette (X3.1-I-EGFP-I) was described previously [ 13].

Science

BMC Cancer

The ECE-1 specific inhibitor, 4-chloro N-[ 4-cyano-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1 H-pyrazol-5-yl)amiN-[ 4-cyano-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1e moN-[ 4-cyano-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1 as ECE-i, was described aN-[ 4-cyano-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1al (2000).

"When I described that person, I realized I was describing Chris," she said.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "I was described", ensure that the context clearly indicates who provided the description and in what setting. This adds credibility and clarity to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "I was described" without specifying who did the describing. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the impact of your statement. Always provide sufficient context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "I was described" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the speaker was the recipient of a description. It highlights how others have portrayed or characterized them, as evidenced by Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

31%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "I was described" is a common and grammatically correct way to report how someone has been characterized or portrayed. According to Ludwig, it is used neutrally across different registers, with a strong presence in news and media as well as scientific contexts. While alternatives like "I was characterized" or "I was portrayed" exist, it's crucial to provide context regarding who did the describing to avoid ambiguity. Overall, the AI analysis from Ludwig confirms that "I was described" is a versatile phrase for conveying opinions and assessments about oneself.

FAQs

How can I use "I was described" in a sentence?

Use "I was described" to report how someone characterized you. For example, "I was described as hardworking during my performance review".

What is a more formal alternative to "I was described"?

A more formal alternative is "I was characterized", which implies a more detailed and thoughtful assessment.

Is it better to use "I was described as" or "I was described to be"?

"I was described as" is generally preferred because it's more concise and direct. "I was described to be" is grammatically correct but can sound overly formal or stilted.

What's the difference between "I was described" and "I have been described"?

"I was described" refers to a specific instance in the past, while "I have been described" suggests a recurring pattern or ongoing characterization. For example, "I was described as shy at the party" versus "I have been described as shy throughout my life".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: