Consistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

"consistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are trying to indicate that something is in agreement with something else. For example, "This report is consistent with the findings of the previous study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Be consistent with it.

The New York Times - Sports

"It's consistent with this.

The New York Times - Sports

This is consistent with that..

The Guardian - Business

I'm consistent with my vices.

The Guardian

That's consistent with the anthrax".

The New York Times

All the circumstances are consistent with suicide.

Independent

This is consistent with the fractures.

The New York Times - Magazine

That is consistent with nationwide trends.

The New York Times

Again, this is consistent with our findings.

The New York Times

That's consistent with the prevailing mood.

The New York Times

Is Ilka consistent with her earlier self?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "consistent with", clearly state what the subject is consistent with. This provides context and clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "consistent with" without specifying what the subject is consistent with. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the impact of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with" primarily functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. It is used to indicate agreement, alignment, or compatibility between two or more elements.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

39%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consistent with" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to indicate agreement, alignment, or compatibility. Ludwig AI analysis, supported by numerous examples, highlights its prevalence across various domains, including science, news, and general writing. While it maintains a neutral to formal tone, ensuring clarity by specifying what is aligned is crucial. Common alternatives include "in accordance with" and "in line with". Remember to use "consistent with" to strengthen claims and provide solid connections between different ideas or pieces of information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

In accordance with

Emphasizes adherence to a rule or standard.

In line with

Highlights alignment or agreement with a plan or idea.

Matching with

Focuses on a direct correspondence or similarity.

Corresponding to

Suggests a parallel or analogous relationship.

Compatible with

Indicates the ability to coexist or function together without conflict.

Harmonious with

Implies a pleasing or congruent relationship.

Agreeing with

Stresses concurrence or shared opinion.

Conforming to

Emphasizes compliance with a set of rules or standards.

Aligned with

Highlights a state of adjustment or coordination.

In agreement with

Focuses on a state of mutual understanding or accord.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with" in a sentence?

Use "consistent with" to show agreement or alignment between two or more things. For example, "The new data is "consistent with" our initial hypothesis".

What's the difference between ""consistent with"" and "in accordance with"?

"Consistent with" implies a general alignment or agreement, while "in accordance with" suggests adherence to specific rules or regulations.

What are some alternatives to using ""consistent with""?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "in line with", "compatible with", or "in agreement with".

Is it always necessary to specify what something is consistent with when using "consistent with"?

Yes, specifying what something is "consistent with" is crucial for clarity. Omitting this information can lead to confusion and weaken your statement.