consistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

"consistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when what you are saying is in line with something else, or supports a particular idea. For example, "My findings are consistent with prior research in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Be consistent with it.

The New York Times - Sports

"It's consistent with this.

The New York Times - Sports

This is consistent with that..

The Guardian - Business

I'm consistent with my vices.

The Guardian

That's consistent with the anthrax".

The New York Times

All the circumstances are consistent with suicide.

Independent

This is consistent with the fractures.

The New York Times - Magazine

That is consistent with nationwide trends.

The New York Times

Again, this is consistent with our findings.

The New York Times

That's consistent with the prevailing mood.

The New York Times

Is Ilka consistent with her earlier self?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "consistent with", ensure that the elements you are comparing genuinely align in a meaningful way. Avoid forcing a connection where one doesn't naturally exist.

Common error

Avoid claiming something is "consistent with" another element if the support is weak or circumstantial. Overstating consistency can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with" functions as an adjectival prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate agreement or alignment. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and frequently used in English, serving to connect ideas and observations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "consistent with" is a versatile and commonly used expression in the English language, indicating agreement, alignment, or compatibility between two or more elements. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. As demonstrated by Ludwig's numerous examples, the phrase finds application across diverse contexts, including scientific research, news reporting, and general communication. When employing this phrase, ensure a genuine and meaningful connection between the elements being compared, while avoiding overstatement of the degree of consistency. Alternatives such as "in agreement with", "in line with", and "compatible with" can offer nuanced variations in meaning. Ultimately, mastering the use of "consistent with" enhances clarity and precision in both written and spoken communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in agreement with

Emphasizes a state of accord or concurrence with something else.

in line with

Highlights alignment or conformity to a standard or expectation.

compatible with

Focuses on the ability of two or more things to exist or work together without conflict.

in accordance with

Stresses adherence to a rule, law, or principle.

harmonious with

Suggests a pleasing or congruent relationship.

congruent with

Implies a correspondence or similarity in form or content.

tallying with

Indicates a match or agreement, often in numerical terms.

coherent with

Emphasizes logical consistency and clarity of connection.

corresponding with

Highlights a similarity or analogy between two things.

reconcilable with

Suggests the possibility of resolving differences or conflicts.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with" in a sentence?

Use "consistent with" to show that something aligns or agrees with something else. For example, "The experimental results are "consistent with" the theoretical predictions."

What is a good alternative to "consistent with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in agreement with", "in line with", or "compatible with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "consistent with" or "in accordance with"?

"Consistent with" generally implies alignment or agreement, while "in accordance with" suggests compliance with a rule or standard. The best choice depends on the specific context.

What does it mean for something to be "consistent with" expectations?

When something is "consistent with" expectations, it means that the outcome or result is what was anticipated or predicted. It aligns with prior assumptions or beliefs.