zero tolerance

USAGE SUMMARY

"zero tolerance" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe situations in which you are showing a strict adherence to rules or laws without any exceptions, such as in the sentence, "The school has a zero tolerance policy for cheating on exams."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

"Zero tolerance"?

The Washington Post

This is zero tolerance".

The New York Times - Sports

Zero tolerance indeed.

The Economist

I am zero tolerance.

The Guardian

Zero tolerance for cheaters!

The Guardian - Sport

Zero tolerance for frivolities.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

Treble-zero tolerance?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Some credit "zero-tolerance" policing.

The Economist

Knobler now has a zero-tolerance policy.

The New York Times - Sports

"They have a zero-tolerance policy.

The Guardian

Zero-tolerance harassment policies.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When implementing a "zero tolerance" policy, clearly define the specific behaviors that fall under it to avoid ambiguity and ensure fair application.

Common error

Avoid applying "zero tolerance" to minor infractions, as it can lead to disproportionate consequences and create a perception of unfairness. Consider the severity of the offense before enforcing such a strict policy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "zero tolerance" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as an adjective modifying another noun (e.g., "zero tolerance policy"). It signifies a strict and uncompromising approach to a particular issue. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Reference

3%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "zero tolerance" is a noun phrase denoting a strict policy of enforcing rules without exception. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is commonly employed in contexts such as News & Media and Wiki, with authoritative sources like The New York Times frequently using the phrase. When using "zero tolerance", ensure clarity in defining prohibited behaviors and consider the potential for disproportionate consequences. Alternatives include "strict enforcement" and "no exceptions policy", which can be used depending on context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no compromise approach

Indicates an unwillingness to negotiate or make concessions.

no exceptions policy

Highlights the absence of exceptions to a rule or standard.

stringent policy

Highlights the rigorous and demanding nature of a policy.

strict enforcement

Focuses on the action of enforcing rules without mentioning leniency.

firm stance

Emphasizes a determined and resolute position.

inflexible rule

Emphasizes the rigidity and unyielding nature of a rule.

rigid standard

Stresses the unbending quality of a set standard.

hard line stance

Implies a firm and unwavering position on a particular issue.

iron fist rule

Suggests authoritarian control and severe punishment.

tough on crime

Specifically relates to strict policies regarding criminal behavior.

FAQs

How is "zero tolerance" used in a sentence?

The phrase "zero tolerance" is typically used to describe a policy or rule that does not allow any exceptions for certain behaviors. For example, "The company has a "zero tolerance" policy for harassment."

What are some alternative phrases for "zero tolerance"?

Alternatives for "zero tolerance" include "strict enforcement", "no exceptions policy", or "inflexible rule". The best choice depends on the specific context.

What does a "zero tolerance" policy typically entail?

A "zero tolerance" policy usually means that any violation of a specific rule results in an automatic and often severe punishment, regardless of circumstances or mitigating factors.

Is "zero tolerance" always the best approach?

While "zero tolerance" can be effective in deterring certain behaviors, it may not always be the most appropriate approach. It's essential to consider the potential consequences of a "zero tolerance" policy and whether it could lead to unfair or disproportionate outcomes.