Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
you failed to include
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "you failed to include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when pointing out that someone did not provide certain information or elements that were expected or required. Example: "In your report, you failed to include the necessary data analysis, which is crucial for our findings."
✓ Grammatically correct
Wiki
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
If you failed to include something relevant to the appeal, consult your counselor about filing a second appeal.
Wiki
There is nothing worse than setting your rates, having your client pay you on time and then finding out you failed to include several expenses that materialized.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
Genes reproduce themselves and as 50% of your progeny's genome will be maternal DNA, you need also to take into account the quality of the maternal genes – something you fail to include in your equation.
News & Media
If you fail to include a signature, your will could be found invalid.
Wiki
Factor disability in at the design stage of any development process: When you introduce universal education without considering the need for mobility devices, braille equipment and hearing aids, you have effectively failed to include disabled children.
News & Media
"It has come to the attention of the Federal Election Commission that you may have failed to include an accurate name of the candidate and an accurate principal campaign committee … when you filed FEC Form 2".
News & Media
Thank you for pointing out that we failed to include the age (P0).
Science
Do you know of any religious or interfaith organizations working for peace that we failed to include in this list?
News & Media
Basically, the statements failed to include the original amount borrowed.
News & Media
The statements had failed to include the original amount borrowed.
News & Media
Mahfouz failed to include the last of the pharaohs: Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "you failed to include" when pointing out a specific oversight, not just a general lack of detail.
Common error
Avoid using "you failed to include" in casual conversation, as it can sound accusatory. Opt for more gentle phrasings like "you might have missed" or "did you remember to add".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "you failed to include" functions as a directive speech act. It points out a specific omission or lack of inclusion, often implying an expectation or requirement that was not met. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Wiki
33%
Science
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "you failed to include" is a grammatically sound and relatively common way to point out an omission. While recognized as correct and usable in written English by Ludwig AI, its tone can sometimes come across as critical, making it more appropriate for professional or neutral settings. Based on the data, it appears frequently in news, Wiki, and scientific contexts. When writing, consider the context and audience to determine if a softer phrasing might be more suitable. Alternatives such as "you didn't include" or "you forgot to include" may be more appropriate in informal scenarios.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
you omitted to include
Uses "omitted" which implies a more formal or deliberate act of leaving something out.
you neglected to include
Uses "neglected" suggesting carelessness or a lack of attention.
you didn't include
A more direct and informal way of stating the omission.
you left out
A simpler and more casual way to express the same idea.
you missed including
Highlights the act of missing or overlooking something.
you forgot to include
Emphasizes the unintentional nature of the omission.
you excluded
Implies a deliberate decision to leave something out.
you didn't account for
Focuses on the lack of consideration for something.
you overlooked
Highlights the failure to notice or consider something.
you failed to mention
Focuses specifically on the omission of a verbal or written reference.
FAQs
How can I use "you failed to include" in a sentence?
You can use "you failed to include" to point out a significant omission. For example, "In your report, "you failed to include" the budget analysis, which is crucial for our review."
What can I say instead of "you failed to include"?
You can use alternatives like "you didn't include", "you omitted", or "you forgot to include" depending on the context.
Is "you failed to include" accusatory?
While grammatically correct, "you failed to include" can sound accusatory. Consider softening the tone with phrases like "it seems something was missed" or "perhaps this wasn't included."
What is the difference between "you failed to include" and "you didn't include"?
"You failed to include" implies a stronger sense of obligation or expectation, while "you didn't include" is a more neutral statement of fact. The former can suggest a more critical tone.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested