Sentence examples for wrongly excluded from inspiring English sources

In some cases, people who feel they have been wrongly excluded from jobs are fighting back.

Judge Paul J. Kelly and Judge Michael W. McConnell of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled for the majority in a 2-to-1 decision that a federal district court judge had wrongly excluded an expert witness for Mr. Nacchio during his trial last year.

In issuing its 5-to-0 opinion, the Supreme Court found that Mr. Coleman, who had argued, in part, that thousands of absentee ballots had been wrongly excluded from the count, had failed to prove that "the trial court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous or that the court committed an error of law or abused its discretion".

The move by City Hall came after weeks of increasingly heated discussions over whether the administration had wrongly excluded the Council from the planning stage of the project, and it clears the way for the city's Transportation Department to award a contract to an operator for the program, known as bike-share, as early as next week.

Three weeks after New York City disclosed that thousands of students had been wrongly excluded from eligibility in public school gifted programs, the Education Department said that roughly 300 additional students received incorrect scores because of another mistake by the testing company.

A spokeswoman for North Tyneside Council said the council would apologise to the resident "wrongly excluded from a public meeting" and accepted appropriate measures were not followed.

Now, however, Mr. Riedel said, the administration ought to reconsider the idea of an emissary for the two countries, saying it wrongly excludes India.

By excluding patients with a PMHI score of 2-3, woulduld wrongly exclude 34 patients (15%) from study entry, but prevent 20 early deaths on study.

Whereas, by excluding patients with a RMI score of 2-3, woulduld wrongly exclude 30 patients (13%), but prevent 12 early deaths on study.

This was done to revert sequences with deviating strand polarity, to exclude wrongly annotated sequences and to ensure that all sequences in a single-gene file were orthologous.

We performed a post hoc sensitivity analysis excluding wrongly included trials (that is, trials included despite their results being sent by responsible parties to ClinicalTrials.gov on the date of randomization, but were not apparent on the ClinicalTrials.gov at the time of randomization).