Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "wrongly cited" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to a mistake or error when citing a source or information in written work. Example: The article was criticized for containing several instances of wrongly cited data, which undermined its credibility.
Exact(15)
Briggs' tribe was wrongly cited.
Forensic Architecture's project was wrongly cited as being about US strikes on Afghanistan, when it was actually about Israeli attacks on Gaza.
Those that remain, said Ms. Sommer, have a stigmatizing effect on same-sex relationships and can sometimes be wrongly cited by law enforcement officers unaware that they are no longer enforceable.
When it comes to regulating credit across Europe, high regulatory standards are needed, not common lending rules.Correction: A previous version of this article wrongly cited the Allied Irish Bank as an example for supervisory failures.
To the rest of the world it is merely baffling, for Tasmania is to this day frequently - and wrongly - cited as the site of the only successful genocide in history.
In the version of this article initially published, in Table 1, page 362, Protelos was wrongly cited as strontium malonate; in fact, Protelos is the current brand name of strontium ranelate.
Similar(45)
But that didn't stop people wrongly citing health and safety to prevent harmless activities from going ahead.
Yet some law firms are also wrongly citing the "right to be forgotten" to suggest that material should be deleted entirely.
The press release issued by the Serbian police also wrongly cites Moneybookers.com, which Djokić and Jagličić used to receive payments from their affiliates, as "one of the biggest online booking sites in the world".
The author also wrongly cites an EMA 'warning'issueded for increasing the dose from 30 to 40 mg/kg per day'.
Colbert, visibly moved, more or less demanded that Biden run for President — if he does, these several minutes on television will be cited, rightly or wrongly, as a turning point.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com