Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

wrongful acquisition

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"wrongful acquisition" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in legal contexts or discussions about unethical or illegal obtaining of property or rights. For example: "The company faced legal action for its wrongful acquisition of trade secrets." Alternative expressions include "unlawful acquisition" and "illegitimate acquisition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Wrongful killing may always be wrong, but is killing?

Science

SEP

It was on wrongful convictions.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We have enough wrongful convictions around here".

News & Media

The New York Times

The three could sue for wrongful dismissal.

News & Media

The Economist

It would also help prevent wrongful convictions.

News & Media

The New York Times

She then sued him for wrongful imprisonment.

Any wrongful prosecutions should be rectified.

News & Media

The New York Times

What is the definition of wrongful eviction?

News & Media

The New York Times

She is now suing for wrongful arrest.

News & Media

The Guardian

The Stitzes countersued for wrongful terminations.

News & Media

The New York Times

Wrongful executions, trust me, have already occurred.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal legal writing, consider whether "wrongful taking" or "unlawful acquisition" is more appropriate based on the specific statutes being cited.

Common error

Avoid using "wrongful acquisition" when you actually mean the ongoing state of holding something illegally. If the act of getting the item was legal but the current holding is not, "wrongful retention" is the more accurate term. Reserve "acquisition" for the specific event of obtaining.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

96%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

In linguistic terms, "wrongful acquisition" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence. According to Ludwig AI, it is highly usable in written English and follows standard grammatical patterns seen in similar legal collocations like "wrongful death" or "wrongful eviction" found in the examples.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "wrongful acquisition" is a grammatically correct and specialized term primarily used in legal, corporate and ethical contexts. While exact matches in casual datasets are rare, its structure mirrors highly common legal terms like "wrongful termination" and "wrongful conviction". Ludwig AI highlights its utility in describing the unethical or illegal obtaining of assets. It is most appropriately used in formal writing where precision regarding the nature of a transaction or procurement is required. Writers should be careful to distinguish the act of 'acquisition' from the state of 'possession' for maximum clarity.

FAQs

How to use "wrongful acquisition" in a sentence?

You can use it to describe an illegal act: "The museum was forced to return the artifacts following allegations of "wrongful acquisition" during the war."

What can I say instead of "wrongful acquisition"?

You can use alternatives like ""unlawful acquisition"", "illegal procurement", or "wrongful taking" depending on the specific legal context.

Which is correct, "wrongful acquisition" or "wrongful taking"?

Both are correct, but "wrongful taking" is a more established term in common law (replevin), whereas "wrongful acquisition" is broader and often used for intangible assets like data or intellectual property.

What is the difference between "wrongful acquisition" and "theft"?

While theft is a criminal charge, "wrongful acquisition" is often used in civil contexts or ethical discussions to describe the illegitimate obtaining of something without necessarily implying a criminal prosecution.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

96%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: