would not argue

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would not argue" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express a reluctance or unwillingness to engage in a debate or disagreement about a particular topic. Example: "While I have my own opinions, I would not argue against the benefits of teamwork in achieving success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Russell would not argue.

The New York Times

Stewart would not argue with his idol.

The New York Times - Sports

Murray would not argue with that.

The Guardian - Sport

Though I myself would not argue.

The New York Times - Books

Mr. Iverianov would not argue with that.

The New York Times

Canadians would not argue with the first two.

The Economist

General McNeill would not argue with some of that.

The New York Times

"I would not argue that this statute is a perfect model of clarity," Mr. Long said.

The New York Times

I would not argue that tax increases are per se stimulative.

The New York Times

"I would not argue that this is something to worry about," Lewis told me.

The New York Times - Magazine

Professor Dawkins would not argue that some biologists are theists and therefore all are.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "would not argue", consider the context. In formal writing, it can be a subtle way to concede a point. In informal settings, it might suggest reluctance.

Common error

Avoid relying too heavily on "would not argue" when trying to strongly convince someone. While it acknowledges opposing viewpoints, it doesn't actively promote your own. Use more assertive language to present your argument effectively.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would not argue" functions as a modal verb phrase used to express agreement, acceptance, or a lack of intention to dispute a statement or idea. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatically correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Academia

11%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Science

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would not argue" is a versatile expression used to indicate agreement or acceptance without strong endorsement. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in news and media. While alternatives like "would not disagree" or "would concede" exist, "would not argue" offers a nuanced way to acknowledge a point while maintaining neutrality. Use it thoughtfully to convey acceptance without necessarily advocating for a position. Be mindful of overuse in persuasive contexts, where a stronger stance may be more effective. Its prevalence across authoritative sources solidifies its reliability in various writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would not disagree

Indicates a lack of disagreement, similar to "would not argue" but slightly more formal.

have no objection to

Expresses a lack of opposition or disapproval.

would not dispute

Emphasizes that something is not being challenged or questioned.

would concede

Suggests admitting something is true, often reluctantly.

would accept

Implies agreeing to or acknowledging something.

cannot refute

Indicates that something is impossible to disprove.

cannot deny

Highlights the undeniable nature of a fact or statement.

do not contest

Formal way to express that you're not challenging something.

would go along with

Suggests willingness to agree or cooperate with something.

find no fault with

Indicates that something is acceptable and without flaws in your perspective.

FAQs

What does "would not argue" mean?

The phrase "would not argue" means that someone is not going to dispute or disagree with a particular statement or idea. It implies agreement or acceptance, sometimes with a hint of reluctance or neutrality.

How can I use "would not argue" in a sentence?

You can use "would not argue" when you want to concede a point or acknowledge something without strongly endorsing it. For example, "I "would not argue" that teamwork is beneficial, even though I prefer working alone."

What are some alternatives to "would not argue"?

Alternatives to "would not argue" include "would not disagree", "would concede", or "have no objection to depending on the context".

Is it better to say "would not argue" or "would not disagree"?

Both "would not argue" and "would not disagree" are correct, but they have slightly different nuances. "Would not argue" implies a lack of intention to dispute, while "would not disagree" suggests a more passive acceptance. The best choice depends on the specific context and the intended emphasis.