Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would normally be

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would normally be" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to talk about something that usually happens but may not be happening in the present moment. For example: “On a normal day, this would normally be a busy street.”.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

However, these effects would normally be temporary.

News & Media

The Guardian

Neutral antihydrogen, however, would normally be unaffected by these fields.

It would normally be the quietest time of the year.

News & Media

The Guardian

This would normally be about a six-month process.

This would normally be considered a state role.

The resort would normally be starting summer activities by now.

Light at the exact wavelength would normally be totally absorbed by the GaAs photovoltaic material.

This innovative and incremental process aims at the remainder reuse which would normally be discarded.

What would normally be seen as virtue and courage is rapacity.

The most desirable adhesive for the new linings would normally be diluted wheat-starch paste.

4. We believe that 40 launchers would normally be equipped with 80 missiles.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would normally be" to describe situations or actions that are generally expected or typical, but might not always occur. This adds a nuance of expectation without absolute certainty.

Common error

Avoid using "would normally be" in contexts that already express a strong conditionality. Overusing 'would' can make the sentence sound redundant. For example, instead of "If it rained, the game would normally be canceled", consider "If it rained, the game would be canceled".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would normally be" functions as a modal construction used to express expectations, typical occurrences, or hypothetical situations. It combines the modal verb 'would' with 'normally' to indicate a customary or usual state, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would normally be" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to express expectations and typical scenarios. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s widely employed across diverse contexts such as news, science, and academia. While "would normally be" is incredibly common, it is important to use it accurately, avoiding redundancy and carefully considering the context to ensure you choose the most suitable expression. Alternatives like "would typically be" or "is generally expected to be" can provide subtle shifts in meaning, and using it correctly can significantly enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "would normally be" in a sentence?

Use "would normally be" to describe actions or situations that are expected to occur under typical circumstances. For example, "This "would normally be" a quiet street, but today it's very busy".

What are some alternatives to "would normally be"?

You can use alternatives like "would typically be", "would usually be", or "is generally expected to be" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "will normally be" instead of "would normally be"?

"Will normally be" suggests a higher degree of certainty, whereas ""would normally be"" implies a conditional or hypothetical situation. Choose the phrase that best reflects the level of certainty you want to convey.

What's the difference between "would normally be" and "is normally"?

"Is normally" describes something that is generally or usually the case in the present. "Would normally be" describes something that is expected to happen under typical circumstances or in a hypothetical situation. For example, "The store is normally open at 9 am" vs. "The store "would normally be" open, but it is closed today because of a holiday".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: