would impede progress for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would impede progress for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing factors or actions that hinder or obstruct advancement in a particular context or situation. Example: "The lack of funding would impede progress for the research project, delaying its completion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

They argued that a ban on research and therapeutic cloning "would impede progress on some of the most debilitating diseases known to man".

The New York Times

They impede progress for the islanders by trying to preserve it.

Vice

The oversight required to do so would be nearly impossible and would eventually impede progress on any number of initiatives.

TechCrunch

But Mr. Kirk said his departure would not impede progress toward a deal.

The New York Times

But Mr. Kirk said that his departure would not impede progress toward a deal.

The New York Times

A few major factors have impeded progress for a lot of Americans as the country wades out of the recession.

The New York Times

There will be no more placebo-controlled trials for eteplirsen, and it will likely be more difficult to persuade families to enroll their children in better-designed trials for potential new treatments for DMD, impeding progress for this rare disease.

Huffington Post

The film doesn't just come out explicitly in favor of gun control and against those who would impede its progress for financial gain.

Forbes

Peers were "totally unconvinced" by the health secretary Jeremy Hunt's insistence that reducing the budget would not necessarily impede progress on public health.

The Guardian

These conceptual errors may slow or impede progress by diverting efforts into solutions for the wrong problems.

F1000Research

However, the often small sample sizes and limited human brains available for studies of axonal organization significantly impede progress in our understanding of these neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Acta neuropathologica communications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use this phrase when you want to express that something will specifically create obstacles that make it harder to achieve improvement or advancement in a particular area.

Common error

Avoid framing sentences with "would impede progress for" in a way that obscures the actor responsible for the impeding action. Make sure it's clear who or what is causing the obstruction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would impede progress for" functions as a connector of purpose, indicating that a particular action or situation will hinder or obstruct the attainment of a desired outcome or advancement. Although Ludwig does not provide exact examples, similar phrases demonstrate this function by connecting actions to their negative impact on progress.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would impede progress for" serves as a connector, indicating that something will obstruct advancement. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English. While exact examples are absent in the provided data, related phrases reveal similar usage patterns, with a neutral register and a communicative purpose to express concerns about potential obstacles. It is crucial to use this phrase when accurately depicting an action or situation that specifically hinders improvement, and to avoid passive voice constructions that obscure the responsible actor.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would obstruct advancement for

Replaces "impede" with "obstruct" and "progress" with "advancement", maintaining a similar level of formality.

would hinder development for

Substitutes "impede" with "hinder" and "progress" with "development", slightly altering the focus to growth-related contexts.

would slow down advancement for

Uses "slow down" instead of "impede", indicating a less abrupt obstruction.

would hamper growth for

Replaces "impede" with "hamper" and "progress" with "growth", emphasizing a negative impact on expansion.

would inhibit the advancement of

Changes the structure to focus on inhibiting the general advancement of something.

would thwart the development of

Employs "thwart" to suggest a more forceful prevention of development.

would derail the advancement of

Uses "derail" to imply a complete disruption of advancement.

would set back the advancement of

Implies that something would be pushed back or delayed.

would undermine the advancement of

Replaces "impede" with "undermine", focusing on weakening the foundation of advancement.

would compromise future progress for

Suggests a detrimental impact on potential progress, implying a trade-off or sacrifice.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "would impede progress for" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "would obstruct advancement for" or "would hinder development for". These alternatives maintain a similar meaning but employ vocabulary that is more often found in formal writing.

What are some less formal alternatives to "would impede progress for"?

Informal alternatives include phrases like "would slow down advancement for" or "would hamper growth for". These options use simpler language that is more appropriate for casual contexts.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use "would impede progress for"?

This phrase is suitable for discussions where a specific action or factor is expected to create tangible obstacles to future advancement or improvement. It's particularly useful when discussing research, policy changes, or strategic initiatives.

How does "would impede progress for" differ from "would delay progress for"?

"Would impede progress for" suggests a more significant obstruction than "would delay progress for". While both indicate a negative impact, "would impede progress for" implies a potentially more serious or long-lasting hindrance, whereas "would delay progress for" suggests a temporary setback.