Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would have done

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"would have done" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something could have been done but was not. For example: "I would have done it earlier if I had known it was due that day."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I would have done that".

News & Media

The New Yorker

He would have done nothing.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It would have done better.

News & Media

The New York Times

We would have done everything".

News & Media

The New Yorker

I would have done.

News & Media

The Guardian

I would have done it no differently.

Anything the team would have done differently?

"The most appearances" would have done fine.

News & Media

Independent

Nobody else would have done it.

I did what anyone would have done.

News & Media

Independent

What Villeneuve or Senna would have done.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "would have done" to express hypothetical past actions and their potential outcomes. This helps to convey nuanced meanings related to unrealized possibilities.

Common error

Avoid using "would have done" when a simple past tense is more appropriate. "Would have done" implies a condition or unrealized action, not a simple statement of fact.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

Would have done functions as a modal construction, expressing a hypothetical action or situation in the past that did not occur. It typically combines with a main verb to indicate what someone would have done under different circumstances. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Academia

25%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "would have done" is a very common modal construction used to express hypothetical past actions or situations. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and versatile, fitting into neutral registers and appearing frequently in News & Media. When writing, remember that "would have done" implies an unrealized condition and avoid using it when a simple past tense is sufficient. For alternatives, consider "should have done", "could have done", or "might have done" to subtly change the meaning.

FAQs

How do I use "would have done" in a sentence?

Use "would have done" to describe something that you could have done, but didn't. For example, "I "would have done" that differently if I had known better."

What's the difference between "would have done" and "should have done"?

"Would have done" indicates a hypothetical past action, while "should have done" implies a moral obligation or recommendation that was not followed.

What can I say instead of "would have done"?

Alternatives include "could have done", "might have done", or "should have done", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "would of done" correct instead of "would have done"?

"Would of done" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is always ""would have done"", using the auxiliary verb "have".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: