Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

would have collapsed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would have collapsed" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to express a hypothetical situation in the past that did not occur, often indicating that something was likely to happen if certain conditions had been met. Example: "If the support beams had not been reinforced, the structure would have collapsed under the weight of the snow."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The banking system would have collapsed.

News & Media

The New York Times

It would have collapsed eventually.

News & Media

The New York Times

Without them, Greek banks would have collapsed.

In three days we would have collapsed.

News & Media

The Guardian

"If he had done nothing, then it would have collapsed.

News & Media

Independent

Without it, the state's papaya industry would have collapsed.

News & Media

The New York Times

For some, the eurozone would have collapsed without German leadership.

News & Media

The Guardian

It would have collapsed anyway, in the end.

News & Media

The Economist

I think a lesser psyche would have collapsed".

News & Media

The New Yorker

"I would have collapsed on the field," Culbreath said.

It would have collapsed the entire show's bogus premise.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid overuse in overly dramatic or speculative scenarios; ensure the context provides a reasonable basis for the hypothetical collapse.

Common error

Ensure you're using "would have collapsed" to refer to a past hypothetical situation, not a current or future one. Using "would collapse" or "will collapse" might be more appropriate for other tenses.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would have collapsed" functions as a modal construction expressing a hypothetical result in the past. It indicates that an event or entity was on the brink of failure, but ultimately did not fail. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

16%

Science

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "would have collapsed" is a versatile modal construction used to describe hypothetical past events that were averted. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts. The phrase is most frequently found in news and media, as well as academic and scientific writing, emphasizing the potential consequences of specific actions or events. When using "would have collapsed", ensure that you clearly convey the hypothetical nature of the situation and maintain consistent tense. Alternative phrases such as "might have crumbled" or "could have failed" can add nuance depending on the intended meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "would have collapsed" in a sentence?

You can use "would have collapsed" to describe a past event that didn't happen but was likely. For example, "If the dam hadn't been reinforced, it "would have collapsed" under the pressure."

What are some alternatives to "would have collapsed"?

Alternatives include phrases like "might have crumbled", "could have failed", or "may have disintegrated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "would of collapsed" grammatically correct?

No, "would of collapsed" is incorrect. The correct form is "would have collapsed". "Would've" is a contraction of "would have".

What's the difference between "would have collapsed" and "would collapse"?

"Would have collapsed" refers to a hypothetical situation in the past that did not occur. "Would collapse" describes a hypothetical situation in the present or future. For example, "If the bridge weren't maintained, it "would collapse" eventually." versus "If the engineers hadn't intervened, the bridge "would have collapsed" last year."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: