would be required to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "would be required to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a necessity or obligation in a hypothetical or conditional context. Example: "Employees would be required to submit their reports by the end of the week to ensure timely processing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Students would be required to fulfill the following requirements.

Stanford University

would be required to start from scratch).

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The creditors would be required to respond to the consumers.

The New York Times

Clips would be required to credit C-Span.

The New York Times

She would be required to enroll in a local college.

The New York Times

Maybe it would be required to have regional approval".

The New York Times

Mining companies would be required to obtain licenses.

The New York Times

Offenders would be required to register in person.

The New York Times

A huge bureaucracy would be required to police this.

The Guardian - Opinion

And real policies would be required to cope with it.

The New Yorker

Kotcheff estimated Rafferty would be required to down 30 pints.

The Guardian - Film

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "would be required to", ensure the context clearly establishes the condition or situation under which the requirement applies. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the logical flow of your writing.

Common error

While grammatically correct, excessive use of the passive voice (as in "would be required to") can make writing sound indirect and less engaging. Consider rephrasing with an active voice construction for a more impactful statement. For example, instead of saying "Applicants would be required to submit their CVs", you could say "Applicants must submit their CVs".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "would be required to" functions as a modal verb phrase expressing obligation or necessity in a conditional or hypothetical context. It indicates that a specific action or condition is mandatory under certain circumstances. Ludwig provides several examples demonstrating its usage across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

36%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "would be required to" is a versatile modal verb phrase used to express obligation or necessity within hypothetical or conditional scenarios. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide usage across diverse fields, including News & Media, Science, and Academia. While grammatically sound, writers should be mindful of potential overuse of the passive voice. Consider alternatives such as "must" or "should", where contextually appropriate. Be mindful that the phrase typically appears in neutral to formal registers. Finally, ensure that the condition or the prerequisite for the requirement is obvious in your sentence to avoid any potential ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

would need to

Indicates necessity, similar to "would be required to", but can be slightly less formal.

would have to

Expresses obligation, closely related in meaning, but slightly more direct.

would be obliged to

A more formal synonym, emphasizing a stronger sense of duty or legal requirement.

would be compelled to

Suggests a strong external force or pressure causing the requirement.

would be expected to

Implies a requirement based on norms, expectations, or standards rather than a strict rule.

would be bound to

Indicates a legal or moral obligation, often suggesting an agreement or promise.

must

Expresses a strong degree of necessity or obligation in a more concise way.

should

Suggests a recommendation or expectation, which is a weaker form of requirement.

are mandated to

Indicates the existence of legal or official mandate for the action.

are under an obligation to

Directly states that there is an obligation that one must adhere to.

FAQs

What is a more concise way to express "would be required to"?

Depending on the context, you can often use "must" or "should" as shorter alternatives to "would be required to", especially when the requirement is clear.

How does "would be required to" differ from "should"?

"Would be required to" indicates a stronger obligation or necessity, whereas "should" suggests a recommendation or expectation. The former implies a rule or formal requirement, while the latter suggests advice or a best practice.

Is "would be required to" formal or informal?

"Would be required to" is generally considered neutral to formal. Its formality depends on the situation, but it is readily used in official, professional, and academic contexts.

What are some alternatives to "would be required to" that emphasize obligation?

Alternatives that emphasize obligation include "would have to", "must", or "are obliged to". These options directly convey that a certain action is not optional.